Social Icons

Showing posts with label Jesus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jesus. Show all posts

Thursday, June 28, 2012

John 12:1-11


Sorry for not posting lately.  Not much to say.  I've been doing a lot of yard work (trimming trees, tearing out bushes, etc).  I've also been dealing with a case of identity theft, so that's taking up a lot of my energy trying to get that sorted out.  I've been to the bank many times and have been to the sheriff's office many times.

I've been reading John as part of the New Testament in a Year class at my church, and was struck by the following section.  You can read mine below, or you can use the new Blogger Bible feature to the very left of your screen. (<--- over there).
John 12:1-3 
Six days before the Passover, Jesus arrived at Bethany, where Lazarus lived, whom Jesus had raised from the dead.  Here a dinner was given in Jesus' honor.  Martha served, while Lazarus was among those reclining at the table with him.  Then Mary took about a pint of pure nard, and expensive perfume; she poured it on Jesus' feet and wiped his feet with her hair.  And the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume.  
One would not typically anoint the feet of a living person.  He or she would wash the head.  You would only wash the feet if someone were dead.  Mary was (rather unconsciously) preparing Jesus for burial, even though he was still alive -- although he wouldn't be for long.

John 12:4-6 
But one of his disciples, Judas Iscariot, who was later to betray him, objected, "Why wasn't this perfume sold and the money given to the poor?  It was worth a year's wages."  He did not say this because he cared about the poor but because he was a thief; as keeper of the money bag, he used to help himself to what was put into it.

As each gospel was written, it seemed to me that as time progressed, each gospel portrayed Judas as being more and more evil.  I recall Mark simply saying that Judas betrayed Jesus.  Matthew and Luke both call him a traitor, and John gives a whole spiel about Judas' thievery.  John writes about Judas' bad character even before the betrayal.  He breaks away from the story at hand to step up on his soap box.

One thing I have noticed with all four gospels is that they all clearly state that Judas was the betrayer, even before it was to happen in the story.  You see, "Judas Iscariot, who betrayed Jesus, did yada yada yada....."  I'm always like, "Why did you (the author) give it away!?"  It's a bad move to give away information like that.  It's like me telling you that the dad dies in the movie The Road.  "The father, who later dies, caught the man who stole their cart of food and clothes and made him strip naked."  See? I gave it away.  It doesn't makes sense for me to do that.  Why did the gospel writers do that?  I guess they expect the reader to be familiar with the story of Jesus and who Judas was.  Still, if the reader knew who Judas Iscariot was, why even mention him as the betrayer?  This just doesn't make any sense to me.

John 12:7 
"Leave her alone," Jesus replied.  "It was intended that she should save this perfume for the day of my burial.  You will always have the poor among you, but you will not always have me."  


Jesus is basically saying, "The poor have been poor for years.  They can wait a few more minutes."

John 12-8-11 
Meanwhile a large crowd of Jews found out that Jesus was there and came, not only because of him but also to see Lazarus, who he had raised from the dead.  So the chief priests made plans to kill Lazarus as well, for on account of him many of the Jews were going over to Jesus and putting their faith in him.

It's interesting to note how the high priests want to kill Lazarus.  However, you don't see this happen.  This never got past the planning stages.  I guess they had too much on their plates (Jesus) to deal with Lazarus.  In the movie The Last Temptation of Christ, Lazarus is seen being killed by Saul to discredit Jesus.

____________

Go out and buy the book The Road by Cormac McCarthy (of No Country for Old Men fame) and read it.  It's incredibly tragic.  After reading it, go watch the movie.  Both are heart-wrenching and you WILL cry.  This is probably one of my favorite fiction books of all time.

Amazon Books: The Road
Amazon Movies: The Road

Saturday, May 26, 2012

April 3, 33

Geologists have found an earthquake happened on April 3, 33. Many people believe Jesus was about 30 years old when he died, making this date probably the day Jesus died.

When geologist study earthquake activity, they look for layers of sediment in the rock that are disturbed.

There are four major types of earthquakes, and they are described here.  Just pay attention to letter B.  Don't worry about letter A.


Scientists are able to calculate the date when the earthquake happened by looking at the surrounding sediments and rock layers like you would look for rings on a tree trunk.  The older the rock layer, the further back in history that rock layer goes.

The author of the article above summarizes a paper written by Colin Humphreys and Graeme Waddington.


  • All four gospels and Tacitus in Annals (XV,44) agree that the crucifixion occurred when Pontius Pilate was procurator of Judea from 26-36 AD.
  • All four gospels say the crucifixion occurred on a Friday.
  • All four gospels agree that Jesus died a few hours before the beginning of the Jewish Sabbath (nightfall on a Friday).
  • The synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) indicate that Jesus died before nightfall on the 14th day of Nisan; right before the start of the Passover meal.
  • John’s gospel differs from the synoptics; apparently indicating that Jesus died before nightfall on the 15th day of Nisan.


Since the calendar has changed several times since Jesus' time, these changes have been factored in and a highly possible date (in today's calendar) is April 3, 33.

This article briefly mentioned the fact that 3 gospels describe a darkness coming over the land after Jesus' death.  This makes me wonder if a volcano somewhere erupted.  Volcanos and earthquakes go hand in hand, as they both are features in the Tectonic Plate theory.  This theory states that the earth is covered is chunks of crust called "plates," and that these plates are not stationary.  When a volcano happens, an earthquake is bound to happen as well.  The area around the Pacific Ocean is called the "Ring Of Fire" because of the various collisions and sliding of the plates.

These plates slide against each other (San Andreas fault in California, where the "Big One" is suppose to happen), the collide with each other (Mount Everest, which is constantly growing taller), and pull away from each other (Mount St. Helen's).  See the picture above.  When plates pull away from each other, the magma underneath becomes exposed, and possibly becomes pressurized and gets released on the crust of the earth, creating a volcano.  The resulting ash and dust can cover a large area.  This dust and ash can be the darkness that is described in the gospels.

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Jesus Christ: God's Trashcan

I am currently transferring some old reel to reel tapes of Dr. J. Vernon McGee for the folks at Church of The Open Door in California right now, and one of the tapes is a sermon called "The Prodigal Family," originally preached on December 4, 1966.  Of the five sides of tape I have transferred so far, this is the most interesting sermon so far.....Here's why.....

Dr. McGee first gives some definitions of some of the names in the book of Ruth, where the majority of this sermon takes place.

Bethlehem: House Of Bread
Judah: Praise
Moab: God's "washbasin" (see Psalm 108:9)
Elimelech: God is my King
Naomi: pleasant; "Mary Sunshine" as Dr. McGee said because of her chipper and positive attitude
Mahlon: unhealthy
Chilion: puny

Alright.  Since Elimelech left Bethlehem (House of Bread) because of a famine, he went to Moab (God's washbasin, or God's trashcan).

This family tree is from Wikipedia.

Now, since Ruth was a Moabite, she was a God's Trashcanian.  Since Obed was Moabite, he was God's Trashcanian.  Since Jesse had Moabite blood in him, God's Trashcanian blood ran in him.   Since David had Moabite blood in him, God's Trashcanian blood ran in him.

Go to Matthew and read the genealogy of Jesus.  Jesus is a descendent of David.  

Thus, Jesus was a God's Trashcanian.......






Sunday, May 20, 2012

Congressman Gipson and the Separation of Church and State

Congressman Andy Gipson of Mississippi recently used the famous Leviticus 20:13 verse in an attempt to justify his beliefs.  The Huffington Post erroneously wrote an article stating that Andy Gipson is calling for the death of gays and lesbians.  I have to say that this is not correct.  Andy Gipson is erroneously using this passage to further his own agenda....not to call for genocide.

I looked up Congressman Gipson's email address because I wanted to express my concerns to him in a polite way, so I sent him this email.




Dear Congressman Gipson,

Please carefully and prayerfully consider what I have written in this email.

Since you are a politician and a worker in a SECULAR institution, I believe you should keep your faith and religion out of your secular work.   If the United States Government were to be a sacred institution, our democracy would in fact be called a Theocracy, much like that of Iran or of ancient Hebrews.

However, I do have to point out the error in your judgment.

The Old Testament became moot the second Christ died on the cross.  The laws in Leviticus are from something called the Holiness Code, which was written for the children of Israel.  Christians do not need to follow these laws.

Jesus said he came here to fulfill the law and prophets.  We are to follow the words of Jesus.  Not the words Moses wrote in Leviticus.  Moses is dead.  Christ took over, and he still reigns today.

Reread Matthew 7 all the way through.  Ask yourself, "Who said this?" Then you can decide whether or not it's your place to judge someone.

It probably shames and saddens God that humans have ridiculed, taunted, teased, beaten, raped, and murdered homosexuals.  These things are hateful and wrong and anyone who does these things in the name of Jesus need to repent right NOW.

One of the bad things about we Christians is that we put sins in an order.  We put several sins in groups and put them in order of how bad we think they are.....ALL sins are bad and need equal treatment.  Not just homosexuality.

Sir, might I ask, what are your sins?

My sins include, but are not limited to, these.

  1. lust
  2. greed
  3. anger
  4. arrogance
  5. bitterness
  6. condemnation
  7. doubting God’s presence (this is a big one for me)
  8. hate
  9. selfishness
  10. swearing
  11. ungratefulness
  12. disobeying God’s will
  13. worshipping false idols (another big one for me)
  14. sexual immorality

All these are just as bad as (and sometimes worse than) homosexuality.

Congressman, I do hope you look back at your remarks and see how you have hurt so many people.  Please ask God to help you and to forgive you.

Thank you for taking time out of your busy schedule to read this.

Jesse



I completely forgot a very important point though.  I forgot to mention that I do not think he was calling for the killing of thousands of people.  I knew what he was trying to say, but his choice of words and Biblical verses were wrong.  

I sincerely and whole-heartedly believe everything I said in my email to Mr. Gipson.  I believe that our morals are different from the morals of Moses' time.  I believe that Jesus came here to take our sins away.  I believe that ALL sins are bad, not just the cherry-picked ones that are easy to fight.  I believe in respect and tolerance for ALL human beings, no matter what race, religion, political party, sexual orientation, and gender orientation.  I believe Matthew 7 is one of the most important chapters in the Bible because it tells us not to do the one thing that humans are known to do the most; judge.

I'm sorry to inform you, but the Holy Bible is not United States Law.

Friday, May 18, 2012

Empty Wallet and a Heart of Gold

A K-Mart store in Kentucky is going out of business.  A man decided that he was going to buy up the rest of the stock, and donate it to charity.......Read the article below.....

Kentucky Man Buys Everything

We as Lutherans see the only way to righteousness is through faith.  That's all hunky-dory and everything, but what does God REALLY think?

If you regularly read my blog, you know that my church hands out water bottles to people stopped at red lights in town.  We are also encouraged to pay for the meals of other people in the restaurant or fast-food drive thru.

This man, however, BOUGHT AN ENTIRE STORE'S STOCK and donated it to charity.........I used to say doing good deeds makes you a real Christian.  Is this true?  I want to think so, but the Bible doesn't.

Romans 3:21-26 
But now apart from the law the righteousness of God has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify. This righteousness is given through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference between Jew and Gentile, for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and all are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus.  God presented Christ as a sacrifice of atonement, through the shedding of his blood —to be received by faith. He did this to demonstrate his righteousness, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished  he did it to demonstrate his righteousness at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus.


This man has a big heart, and an empty wallet now.  I'd like to see him as a true Christian.....

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Thoughts Askew

Last year, in June, my mother was getting the mail (or doing something outside) when she saw a man with a large backpack walking down the road we live on.  He stopped by and chatted a little bit with mom.  His name is s, and he is walking across the entire United States to raise money for the Wounded Warrior Project.  Here is the organization's mission and purpose.



  • To raise awareness and enlist the public's aid for the needs of injured service members.
  • To help injured service members aid and assist each other.
  • To provide unique, direct programs and services to meet the needs of injured service members.



Mom came back inside and got him a bottle of water.  They chatted for a few minutes about dad and his liver transplant that he had back in December of 2010, and his broken hip a few months later.  She then told him about how he had missed several major festivals around the area: The Nelsonville Music Festival (where I had seen rockabilly and country artist Wanda Jackson), the Moonshine Festival (where I had seen Tommy Cash, brother of the late Johnny Cash), and the Washboard Music Festival.  Later that night, Mr. McCandless wrote a blog about his meeting with my mother.  You can read that blog post here.  His entire blog is very interesting and very funny.  


I was thinking about this chance encounter, and what my mother and Mr. McCandless talked about, I was reminded of this week's Gospel lesson and sermon at church.  
John 15: 12-13 [Jesus said,] "This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you.  No one has greater love than this, to lay down one's life for one's friends." (NRSV)


Dad has Hepatitis C, which is a disease that kills the liver.  The liver filters out the ammonia from the body, and when the liver is dying (or dead), the ammonia builds up in the brain.  For about six months, dad was not dad.  He was confused as to where he was, and maybe as to who he was. He had taken a leave of absence at work in May of 2010 just after I graduated from high school, and was finally admitted to the hospital in October after a terrible fall.  He was not doing well between October and December.  The last day of the semester at Capital University was the day the Cleveland Clinic called because they had found a new liver for dad.  I was not home two hours when that call came in.  I remember it seemed like it took us a whole day to drive from our humble abode in Southeastern Ohio to the bustling city of Cleveland.  I remember mom, my sister, and I were all silent the whole way up, save for a few words about going to the bathroom.  Also, I remember it was snowing, making our trip take longer than usual.

Dad received his liver early the next morning around 3am.  The surgery lasted until noon, where he lost nearly 25 liters of blood, a VERY large amount seeing that the body only holds about 7 liters.  We went up after the surgery to ICU.  Four years prior when mom, dad, and I took some time away from work and school to go to Cleveland for 3 days to get some tests done, we went around the whole Cleveland Clinic complex.  We walked into ICU to check it out.  I guess we did that so we can expect what to see when the actual surgery happened.  It didn't frighten me like usual.  Only two of us could go see dad, so I stayed behind while my sister and mom went into the room.  When my sister came out, I went in.  Dad had a respirator on, and two skin-colored pads on his cheeks holding it in.  The nurse there was shaving his face with a Gillette safety razor around the various tubes, knobs, buttons, and switches that were implanted in him.  We asked the nurse if he could be woken up, so she woke him up with some sort of medicine through his Peripherally inserted central catheter.  We talked to him a little, but he was still under a lot of drugs so he couldn't communicate very well.

Mom told him that he had lost 25 liters of blood, and his eyes widened and he pointed up to God with his hands still restrained to the bed.  We told him we loved him and that he will be ok, so he patted our hands.  The nurse then put dad back to sleep.

I honestly expected dad to be much worse.

We don't know much about the woman who passed away, but we do know that her organs were donated to save the lives of many, including my dad.  I think this kind of thing is what Jesus was talking about when he said to give one's life to his or her friend, (even if they don't know each other at all).  This woman died (how? I don't think it really matters), and her body helped save the lives of many others.


Thursday, May 3, 2012

Another school year complete...

....As I look back and reflect on the school year, I realize I have grown spiritually so much.

I have taken three religion courses (an introduction, Jesus Through The Ages, and Reformation and Enlightenment).  Not only have I learned more about religion and Christianity, but I have learned more about Jesus and myself.

Only lately have I been reading the Bible more thanks to a dear friend of mine to whom I look up to a lot and is an inspiration to me.  It breaks my heart to know that I won't be seeing him until next January, because I won't be at Capital next semester (it's my professional semester, which means I have to go to the Recording Workshop in Chillicothe, Ohio, and my internship).

Things I have accomplished:

I have read all the Psalms.
I have read Matthew twice.
I have read Mark once, and I'm in the process of reading it again.
I have read Luke once,
and I've read John once.

I have read Jude, Titus, Hebrews, James, Peter, 1-3 John, and others that I can't remember.

Whenever I see a verse that questions me, I ask someone, usually my pastor, about how to interpret it.  For example, I had a question about Matthew 5:48.

[Jesus said:] "Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect."

I got a quick response.  You can see the response here. 


I have also come to love writing more, even if I'm still not very good at it.  I have come to love writing here on this blog about my growth as a Christian.


I love responding to emails and comments.  Feel free to send me an email in the Contact page above, or in the many blog posts I have made.

I hope to keep up blogging throughout the summer because I know at least one person reads it.

Have a good summer!


Monday, April 23, 2012

Thich Nhat Hanh: _Living Buddha, Living Christ_

I'm reading a book for my Jesus Through The Ages class at Capital University.   We are currently in Thich Nhat Hanh's book called, Living Buddha, Living Christ.  On page 125, Nhat Hanh says this...

There is a story of one woman who invoked the name of Buddha hundreds of times a day without ever touching the essence of a Buddha.  After practicing for ten years, she was filled with anger and irritation.  Her neighbor noticed this, and one day while she was practicing invoking the name of the Buddha, he knocked on her door and shouted, "Mrs. Ly, open the door!"  She was so annoyed to be disturbed, she struck her bell very hard so that her neighbor would hear she was chanting and would stop disturbing her.  But he kept calling, "Mrs. Ly, Mrs. Ly, Mrs. Ly, I need to speak with you."  She became furious, threw her bell down on the ground, and stomped to the door, shouting, "Can't you see I'm invoking the name of the Buddha?  Why are you bothering me now?"  Her neighbor replied, "I only called your name twelve times, and look how angry you have become.  Imagine how angry the Buddha must be after you have called his name for ten years."


Have we been calling God's name hundreds of times a day for ten years, just talking, and not ever touching the essence of God?  Could this be why we are angry people?

Friday, April 20, 2012

Mark 4:34

I'm quietly participating in the Read The New Testament In A Year program at my church, even though I'm not attending the sessions because of school commitments take up my time.  Each day of the work week (Monday through Friday), we read one chapter. Today's reading was from Mark 4.

Jesus was at the river talking to the crowd of people, speaking in parables to them.  This sermon includes the parable of the sower and the seed.

Mark 4:34 
He did not say anything to [the crowd at the river] without using a parable.  But when he was alone with his own disciples, he explained everything.

A question came to my mind.

Why would Jesus not go ahead and explain the parables to the crowd?

Here are some of the solutions I came up with.


  1. Jesus knew his 12 disciples well, and he knew they were the chosen ones to spread his good news, and everyone else was somehow not ready to receive it.
    • I think number one is the best possibility.  Here's why.  Jesus wanted only those who were his true followers to know what his teachings.  We too can know these things if we ask God to help us understand them.  
  2. Jesus was not ready to reveal his good news to the regular everyday people quite yet, but when the time came he would.
    • I think Jesus knew that anyone who wanted to know what he meant was able to walk up to him and ask.  
  3. Jesus knew the crowd of people wouldn't listen to him anyway.
    • I'm stuck on number 3.  Jesus knew that he would have to die to save humans from sin.  He knew it would be humans who would put him to death, so why waste his time on trying to teach the very same people he knew would put him to death?  
  4. The crowd was smart enough to figure the parables out, but his disciples weren't.
  5. The disciples were smart enough to figure the parables out, but the crowd wasn't
    • Jesus knew his disciples were to continue teaching about the kingdom of heaven, and he wanted his disciples, and only his disciples, to know about his Divine Word. 
  6. Jesus didn't care about the crowd.


Of course, you are all probably thinking the very last one is blasphemous.  It is.  I agree with you.


I recall somewhere that when Jesus was speaking about the kingdom of heaven, he spoke in parables.  When he was talking about other subjects, he did not use parables.  

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Jesus in Movies Analyzed


[This paper was written for my Jesus Through The Ages class at Capital University, where I'm seeking a minor degree in religion.  In this assignment, I was to analyze three films that depict the images of Jesus: one a traditional film, a non-traditional film, and a film that isn't about Jesus, but could be seen as a metaphor for Jesus.]

Jesse Harmon
RELIG 210
April 16, 2012
Movie Images
            I chose to watch the following movies to see their various depictions of images of Jesus: The Passion of the Christ (2004), Jesus Christ, Superstar (1973), and The Matrix (1999).  This paper will analyze all three films to find literal, figurative, and metaphorical images of Jesus.           
            The first film I am analyzing is The Passion Of The Christ.  This movie, released in 2004, is a direct story of the death of Jesus, so analyzing it for the image of Jesus wasn’t hard at all.  This movie portrays Jesus just like the image at a Brazilian church.  Jesus is horrifically mortified and mangled, and in intense pain.  I think this is one of the most graphically detailed films I have ever seen.  I have never seen such intense pain and agony in one person than I have with this film. 
            During the start of the film in the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus is obviously tortured mentally about his impending doom.  He is pleading to be spared.  He prays so hard that he is sweating blood.  When Judas and the authorities come to arrest him, his confidence grows and his golden eyes pierce you.  When Judas kisses Jesus, Jesus’ expression changes to one of disappointment.  After a fight ensues between Jesus’ followers and the police, and one of the guard’s ears is cut off, Jesus heals the man and reattaches the ear; the man is in shock and awe the rest of the scene.  This shows the compassion that Jesus has for everyone, and reflects what he said at the Sermon on the Mount: love your neighbor, and love your enemy.
            Jesus doesn’t resist or put up a fight when he was arrested.  He just accepts his fate and goes along with the brutality that is upon him.  The guards whip him and wrap chains and rope around him.  Arrests that are made today are much more human than thrown a man over the side of a bridge and catching him with a chain around his torso before he hits the ground.  I cannot imagine the internal damage done when something like this happens. 
            When the movie cuts to the scene in the woodshop, Jesus is seen working hard building a table.  Jesus is seen conversing with his mother about the rather tall table, and then when he washes his hands before dinner, he playfully throws water onto Mary.  Why would he do such a thing?  It’s because he’s human, just like us.  He likes to have fun and enjoys a good laugh.  I like to have fun and enjoy a good laugh.
            Back to the arrest scene, Jesus expresses disappointment after Peter denies him three times.  Peter, who then goes crazy, leaves the area crying.  Jesus again is shown with human attributes.  After confronting the Pharisees, Judas goes nuts as well and is assaulted by hallucinations of demonic children.  I would think any normal person would have a mental breakdown after turning someone so special, like Jesus, into the police (I know I would). 
            One of the more surprising things about the trial scene is how gently the Romans treat Jesus at first.  They don’t throw him around.  Pilate, as I will describe later, is very adamant about prosecuting an innocent man.  Jesus, who by now has about 75% of his skin torn off, is in dire need of help.  A King of Kings wouldn’t be seen as this bloody and this mangled.  A King of Kings would probably be seen in a nice air-conditioned courtroom with seven lawyers and many supporters around him.  This man, who is mangled and writhing in pain, is not a king.  He doesn’t even look like a king.  He is stooped over and desperately wanting to sit down.  I couldn’t even watch the scene where Jesus is being whipped.
            Along the Via Dolorosa, Jesus is in dire need to rest.  The cross (which interestingly is pre-made, unlike the other two) appears to be very heavy, making it nearly impossible for the very fragile and weak Jesus to carry alone (he eventually gets help).  Jesus here isn’t the superman that some pictures show.  He doesn’t have a rock-hard six-pack of abs and his biceps and triceps aren’t bulging.  His flesh is nearly falling off, and he can barely walk.  Why would a king or a savior be in such a condition?  Only a man could be like this.
            When the movie cuts to the Last Supper scene, Jesus is seen as a calm and compassionate man, unlike what I will describe later in Jesus Christ, Superstar.  He is talking calmly to his disciples and has a smile on his face.  He is happy explaining to his disciples that the only way to God is through him.
            Even though the nailing on the cross was graphic, it was nothing compared to what he had previously endured.  I don’t think it really makes any difference, after watching this movie, if Jesus died while nailed to the cross.  He suffered so much in this movie, and death seemed almost kind.
            His followers obviously see Jesus as a sweet savior.  His mother gently kisses his feet while he is on the cross, as to signify that she is kissing the feet of God himself.  Her hands are trembling a lot when she does this.  Who wouldn’t think he is God after experiencing an earthquake right after a man has died?  That seems too much like a coincidence to me.  The priests are obviously wondering what just happened.  Are they wondering if the death of a man caused this?
The second film I will analyze is the film adaption of the hit musical Jesus Christ, Superstar, by Andrew Lloyd Weber and Tim Rice from 1973.  This film portrays Jesus very differently than The Passion Of The Christ or The Matrix. I believe this film portrays Jesus as humanly as it can, much like the Gospel of Mark does.  It does so by showing Jesus’ emotions, and his almost being tempted by what appears to be a seductive Mary Magdalene.  We will discuss this later.
            I was reminded why I never liked this musical to begin with.  I think the story and the plot are fantastic, but the music, words, and acting can be severely improved upon.  Since I am seeking a degree in music technology, I tend to analyze things as an audio engineer.  The sound in this film is atrocious.  There are many horrible tape edits that I noticed (since digital recording wasn’t prominent until about 1982).  Recording was mainly done on old reel to reel tapes, which were poorly made to save money.  I noticed that there were absolutely no background noises.  I didn’t hear any birds chirping, or any sounds of sand shifting in the wind.  I wonder if this was intentional.  Did the director want us to focus on the storyline and the words instead of distracting us with noises from the background?  This also seems to reflect the Gospel of Mark.  Mark was probably the first gospel written that is included in the canon, and it is the shortest gospel.  Mark is very fast paced, almost like a journalist who wants to be the first person to get his story out.  He writes down just the basic facts, and doesn’t elaborate much on it.  For example, the story of Jesus’ temptation (which is not in the movie, but written here to explain a point), is fairly short.  Mark 1:12-13 says, “The Spirit immediately drove him out into the wilderness.  And he was in the wilderness for forty days, tempted by Satan; and he was with the wild beasts.”  While Luke’s account of the temptation is nearly 13 verses long, and Matthew’s is 10 verses long, both are about equal length (Aland). 
            Jesus Christ, Superstar can reflect the style of the Gospel of Mark.  Each song is a different part of the story of the Holy Week.  The first song shows us Judas’ personal conflict with Jesus.  He sees Jesus as a person, and not divine.  The song, “Heaven On Their Minds,” talks about Judas’ doubts about Jesus being the Son of God.  One of the lines is “strip away the myth from the man.”  I’m reminded of what Thomas Jefferson did to two Bibles back in the 1700s.  He took a razor, destroyed the sections of scripture that describe the “supernatural” aspects and miracles of Jesus.
Mary Magdalene is very touchy of Jesus during the song, “Everything’s Alright.”  She is putting oil on his face and being very seductive of him.  Some of Jesus’ expressions make me wonder what he’s thinking.  It’s not very obvious, but I think he’s very tempted to have sex with her by the way she’s seducing him.  I know I would be tempted by if a woman were to start caressing me and touching me like Mary Magdalene was touching Jesus.  Judas was obviously upset about the way the disciples were talking to Jesus and how they marveled at his works and teachings, since he thinks Jesus is simply a teacher of morals.
            Something interesting happened during the scene that comprised of the song called “Hosanna.”  I’m not sure if this was intentional, or just a glitch in the copy of the film that I have, but when the chorus was singing, “Hey J.C. J.C. would you die for me,” the camera froze on Jesus’ expression, and his expression was that of, “oh, no.”  If it is a glitch on my DVD, then it’s a great coincidence.  The expression shown also shows that Jesus was a human just like everybody else, and that he felt pain and emotion. 
            I never really imagined what would have gone on in the Temple when Jesus drove out the venders, but this film really showed me what might have happened.  I was horrified when I saw strippers and women prostituting themselves in the Lord’s house!  “This is appalling,” I thought, and then I wondered if Jesus thought of the exact same thing.
            The Jesus in Jesus Christ, Superstar experienced stress after being overwhelmed by the sheer amount of people outside the city of Jerusalem after driving the venders out of the temple.  I can only imagine what really happened to Jesus when hundreds of people storm him and crowd around him wanting to be healed.  I’m reminded of when country superstar Garth Brooks appeared at the old Fan Fair in Nashville, Tennessee, unannounced.  Fan Fair, now renamed the CMA Music Festival, is a day long event where country music stars conglomerate together in one place and sign autographs for fans.  They usually stay 3-5 hours and then leave.  Garth, on the other hand, signed for 23 hours.  I can only imagine how much time Jesus spent healing people and performing miracles.  Scripture says that many of the miracles haven’t been included in the Bible.  He stood on his feet for 23 hours straight signing autographs for people who didn’t expect him to be there.
            The Last Supper was an interesting scene.  In this scene, Jesus and Judas reach their climax.  Jesus and Judas are yelling at each other.  Judas, who has already offered to turn Jesus into the authorities, has asked Jesus who will betray him.  Jesus gets up, and storms over to Judas and yells that Judas will betray him.  I remember from the Bible that Jesus took Judas aside, and from what I understand, had a very calm and collected conversation about what is going to happen.  Matthew 26:20-25 shows a very calm and collected Jesus.  “Truly I tell you, one of you will betray me.”  It is fairly hard to express emotion on paper, but to me that seems calm.  The Jesus in the movie is very different.  His fuse is short, and his temper is flaring. 
            During the scene in the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus is pleading with God to not die.  He even says, which surprises me, “If I die what will be my reward?”  I’ve never wondered what reward Jesus got for dying.  I really cannot come up with any conclusions as to what Jesus got out of dying except to say that he has been the only person who has been to hell, earth, and heaven.  This obviously shows the confusion and the sadness and anxiety expressed by someone who knows he or she is about to die.  There are five stages of death: Denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance.  This scene obviously shows the bargaining aspect.  The depression and acceptance stages are seen during the scene when Jesus and Pilate meet for the second time.  Pilate, in the movie, is a very condescending character, unlike what I see in the gospels.  The Pilate in the gospels seem confused and bewildered, and not at all the uptight and conceited man seen in the film.  He seems to have the “guilty until proven innocent” mind set (recall the Casey Anthony trial and the mindset that many people had about her killing her child, even though the evidence wasn’t there).  Pilate is like this the first time he meets Jesus, and also after the second time (after the atrocious King Herod Song). 
            The crucifixion itself is not at all bloody and gory that The Passion Of The Christ was.  This was like the first picture I showed during my art presentation; very modest and calm and collected.  The Passion Of The Christ, as I mentioned before, is like the image of Jesus at the Brazilian church.  The final stage of death, acceptance, takes place when Jesus says the last words, “Into your hands I commit my spirit.”
The third and final film is The Matrix, released in 1999.  The main character indirectly shows attributes to various Biblical characters such as Doubting Thomas and Jesus himself.  Trinity, another main character, is an obvious play on the Holy Trinity (God: The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit).  The Matrix (seen in a green color scheme) can be seen as the world of sin, and the real world (seen in a blue color scheme), can be seen as the salvation.
Neo, or Thomas Anderson, is not a direct parallel to Jesus, but has a lot of similarities to Jesus.  He was a man who was found to be “The One” to help the people of Zion (a Biblical city) survive.  Morpheus, who can be seen as John The Baptist, gives Thomas Anderson (whose first name, Thomas, can be seen as Doubting Thomas, and his last name means “son of man”), or Neo, the choice of taking a red pill or a blue pill.  This choice could mirror the belief or unbelief in the teachings and salvation that Jesus Christ brought to us when he died on the cross.  The One could be seen as God, and Neo could be seen as Jesus.  Why is this?  Neo is called as a successor to The One.  I find it interesting that the name Neo has the same letters as the word One.  Not only is Neo a good representation of Jesus, but also the whole story line can be paralleled to that of the Bible.  The first matrix was designed to be perfect.  This could parallel what God had in mind before destroying the world with a flood.
When Agent Smith captures Morpheus, he is drugged and nearly dies.  This struggle can be seen as someone entering the world of sin (the Matrix) and becoming stuck.  Sin is the pulling away from a relationship with God, and Morpheus can be seen as pulling away from the real world.  Neo and the gang go back into the Matrix to retrieve Morpheus from his captors.  Jesus came into this world to retrieve us from the bondage of sin. 
The climax of the movie involves Neo getting shot.  He is in a great battle with Agent Smith, and as Agent Smith shoots Neo, he dies in the Matrix and in real life.  This can sort of be seen as Jesus dying on the cross.  Neo was crucified.  Jesus was crucified.  After three days, Jesus rose from the dead.  In the movie, Trinity (acting as the Holy Spirit) kisses Neo and he comes back to life.  Neo has been resurrected from the dead, and is in love with Trinity.  After being resurrected, Neo is now Super-Neo is enters Agent Smith.  Agent Smith’s skin then starts to bubble, and eventually Neo destroys Agent Smith from within, just like Jesus destroyed sin and death from within. 
I personally believe The Passion Of The Christ portrays Jesus the best.  It shows the humanness of Jesus, while still maintaining a mystic figure.  It shows the humanness of Jesus.  It shows the Son of Man.  Jesus died on the cross to save us from sin and death.  The brutality that is shown in this film is almost too much to believe.  It’s hard for me to wrap my mind around the fact that someone took a bullet to save my life.  Sometimes, when I think about what Jesus did, I tear up because I know I’m not worthy of being saved.  I’ve done some horrible things in my life that aren’t worthy of being forgiven.  I’m very grateful for Jesus and what he did for me.  I wrote before that a king or a savior cannot be in such a condition that his skin is nearly falling off.  Only a man could do that.  However, Jesus wasn’t just a man.  He was God, and Man.  He had the best (or worst) of both worlds.  He had the divine power that God had, and he had the weight of the world on his shoulders.  He had the intimacy to be close to people, and he felt pain and suffering.
I’ve come to the conclusion that the main difference between The Passion of the Christ and Jesus Christ, Superstar, is that in The Passion, Jesus mainly feels physical pain and agony.  In Jesus Christ, Superstar, Jesus mainly feels emotional turmoil, rage, and frustration.  The Matrix really made me think about what it meant for someone to die from someone else.  I would really like to find a good movie that shows the divine aspect of Jesus, as well as a film that shows the continuing influence of Jesus on people today. 







Works Cited
Aland, Kurt. Synopsis of the Four Gospels. 3rd. United Bible Societies, 1979. Print.
Gibson, Mel, dir. The Passion Of The Christ. Newmark Films, 2004. Film.
Jewison, Norman, dir. Jesus Christ, Superstar. Universal Studios, 1973. Film.
Wachowski, Andy, dir. The Matrix. Warner Bros. Pictures, 1999. Film.


Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Martin Luther and The Lord's Prayer


[This paper was written for my Reformation and Enlightenment class at Capital University, where I am seeking a minor degree in religion.]

Jesse Harmon
RELIG 321
April 19, 2012
Martin Luther and the Lord’s Prayer
            “O Almighty God, in your unmerited goodness to us and through the merit and mediation of your only beloved Son, Jesus Christ, you have permitted and even commanded and taught us to regard you and call upon you as one Father of us all.”  Martin Luther wrote these words in his Personal Prayer Book, published in 1522 (Luther 44).  This paper will be discussing Martin Luther’s view on the Lord’s Prayer, as well as discussing how he came to these conclusions through the use of Scripture readings.  Even though all seven petitions will be discussed, we will be delving into the fifth petition, which is the petition of sin and forgiveness.  Also to be discussed will be several ultimate examples of forgiveness.  The two primary sources used in this paper will be a sermon given by Martin Luther called “An Exposition of the Lord’s Prayer,” published in 1519 (known hereafter as the “sermon,”) and the Personal Prayer Book.  The Personal Prayer Book is a small book published by Luther just days after returning to Wittenberg from hiding in Wartburg.  This book is printed in a diary format that was common among the time (Tunseth 25).
            The Lord’s Prayer, or sometimes called the Model Prayer (Golloday 157), is an easy and short prayer that Jesus offered to his disciples after they asked him about prayer.  Jesus states that one should not “sound trumpets” or pray loudly.  One should not use long sophisticated phrases or, as Jesus called it, empty phrases, when praying as to impress people.  Instead, one should go to a quiet area and pray quietly.  In the gospel of Luke, an unnamed disciple asked Jesus how to pray.  Jesus then gave a more intimate and smaller form of the Lord’s Prayer than what Matthew had in his gospel.  There are only about sixty-seven words in the prayer, making it very easy to memorize if used with a poetic meter.  Jesus does not give long exaggerated words, but instead makes it very simple and easy to remember (we will be looking at the format of the Lord’s Prayer near the end of this paper).  We should be careful, however, not to take “simple” as meaning being “dumbed down” or “shallow.”  That wasn’t the point of Jesus giving such easy words in the prayer.  The point was to make it simple to memorize, and to make it easy to come up with your own version of it if needed (Golloway 158).  The Lord’s Prayer is to be memorized in Lutheran Catechism classes, along with Luther’s explanations in The Small Catechism
            The first line of the Lord’s Prayer is not a petition.  It is an address to God.  Luther states that the word father is intimate, warm, and friendly (Luther 22).  Other words such as God, Lord, and Judge are too harsh in a situation like this.  This prayer is to bring peace and comfort to those who are praying it.  Luther states that since this prayer is said directly by Jesus, it is a necessity to pray it.  Throughout his sermon, Martin Luther gave “modern-day” explanations of each petition using new words and phrases.  Luther uses the following words to describe the “Our Father,” section of the Lord’s Prayer.  “Our Father, you are in heaven, while I, your poor child, am in misery on earth, far away from you surrounded by many perils, in need and want among devils, the greatest enemies and in such danger,” (Luther 23).  These little phrases really help explain what Luther is trying to say in not only his sermon, but also in later articles and resources he published. 
Those who are praying should notice the use of plural possessive forms in this prayer (our Father), giving a sense of community to those who pray this prayer.  Luther tells us to pray this prayer from the heart, and not to “count the beads…while [the] mind wanders far from the confession of [the] lips,” (Luther 23), for God said in the book of Isaiah 29:13, “’These people come near me with their mouth and honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me.  Their worship of me is made up only of rules taught by men,’” (Bible Across America 1238)  (this scripture is also quoted in the gospel of Matthew 15:6-9). 
            The first petition of the Lord’s Prayer is, “Hallowed be thy name.”  This states that God’s name is holy unto itself.  To hallow something is to hold something sacred (Schramm 128), or something regarded as holy (Simcox 44).  In Luther’s Personal Prayer Book, he states to God, “In this wretched vale of tears your holy name is sadly profaned, blasphemed, and reviled in so many ways.  In so many instances it is regarded without honor to you and is often misused in sinning, so that to live a disgraceful life might well be regarded as the same as disgracing and dishonoring your holy name,”  (Tunseth 45).  Here, Luther is trying to say that God is everything, and man in nothing.  In his sermon, Luther states that humans use God’s name to justify war, sinning, and breaking the second commandment, which is, “You shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God, for the Lord will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name,” (Bible Across America 142). Using God’s name to justify these things is taking his name in vain according to Luther.  One of the more interesting things that Luther stated in his sermon is that, “if anyone were to hallow God’s name perfectly, then we [wouldn’t] need the Lord’s Prayer,” because we would be sinless (Luther 33).
            “Thy kingdom come,” is the second petition.  According to Luther, this petition humbles us (Luther 37).  As mentioned before, Luther “rewrote” the petitions to help people understand what they are saying.  “O dear Father…I confess and am sorry that I have dishonored your name so often and that in my arrogance I still defile your name by honoring my own,” (Luther 35-36).  The fourth commandment states, “You shall honor your father and your mother,” (McCain 452).  Luther stated that to honor your own name is to honor your father and mother since your last name is generally your family name.  It is a commandment to honor your father and mother (or your own name), but you should not honor your name more than you honor God’s name.    
            The third petition is “Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.”  Whose will needs to be done?  God’s will, according to this petition.  Luther states in the Personal Prayer Book that compared to God’s will, the will of humans is never good and always evil (Tunseth 48).  Martin Luther states in his sermon several things about this petition.  First, he discusses the meaning of the petition.  Luther states that without a teacher, people must learn to not follow their own wills.  In fact, people need to run counter to their own will because it is usually the will of God.  However, we are sinners who cannot do God’s will, for it is difficult for us to surrender our own wills (Luther 44). 
            Martin Luther gives a great example of this.  King David wanted to build God a temple, but God refused David for doing it.  God said to David, “You are not to build a house for my name, because you are a warrior and have shed blood,” (Bible Across America 814).  After this, God set Solomon on the throne to build the temple.
            The “daily bread” mentioned in the fourth petition (“Give us this day our daily bread), could have several meanings.  The first meaning is obvious; God wants us to be fed and stay healthy.  During ancient times when the people of Moses were wandering the wilderness, God provided manna to keep the people fed.  Could the “daily bread” mentioned in this petition have something to do with being fed by God?  This could be possible, but it doesn’t seem to fit the theme of the Lord’s Prayer.  According to the old outdated food pyramid, humans should generally eat 6-11 servings of bread per day (1 slice of bread is a serving) ("Pyramid Servings: How Much? How Many?").  It seems that bread signifies life.  Jesus broke bread during the Last Supper and gave it to his disciples.  It would make more sense to see the “daily bread” as the Word of God.  The Word, mentioned in the first chapter of the Gospel of John, is Jesus.  “In the beginning was the Word, and Word was with God [Jesus is God], and the Word was God [Jesus is the Word].  He was with God in the beginning,” (Bible Across America 1844).  According to the fourth petition, we need Jesus everyday to get through our lives, since Jesus is the Word, and the Word is the bread of life.  We are reminded that Jesus is the bread in Luke 22:19, “[He] took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to [his disciples] saying, ‘This is my body given for you; do this in remembrance of me,’” (Bible Across America 1834). 
            Luther, who is explaining the fourth petition in his own words, says, “Oh Father…comfort me, a poor and miserable wretch.  I cannot bear your hand and yet I know that it works to my damnation if I do not bear it.  Therefore, strengthen me, my father, lest I despair,” (Luther 51).
The fifth petition states, “And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.” Luther states simply that we cannot lie to God.  He knows what we want before we pray.  Matthew 6:8 states, “…your Father knows what you need before you ask him,” (Bible Across America 1667).  Ironically, this verse is just one phrase before the start of what is known as the Lord’s Prayer in the Bible, which is Matthew 6:9-13.  What does this petition mean?  According to Luther’s Small Catechism, it means that we should pray that God not hold our sins against us if we forgive others for their sins toward us. 
            A very good example of forgiving someone is the assassination attempt of Pope John Paul II (1920-2005).  On May 13, 1981, Pope John Paul II was struck with a bullet while traveling in St. Peter’s Square in the “Pope Mobile.”  Mehmet Ali Agca had in fact shot him twice (Tanner).  Three months after the shooting, the Pope visited his attacker in jail to discuss the situation.  Even though the Pope never revealed the conversation between the two, one can only guess that the Pope prayed with his attacker, and forgave him.  This is a prime example of someone forgiving someone’s trespasses against them.
            Another great example of forgiveness is the story of Nelson Mandela.  In 1962, Mandela was arrested for organizing a national worker’s strike.  He was sent to prison for five years, but was sent back to trial in 1963.  This trial led him to be sent to prison for life, for which he spent nearly 20 years.  While still in prison, he somehow managed to earn a bachelor of law degree, and in 1981, an international campaign was set up to help release Mandela from prison.  Mandela refused to recant his beliefs on armed struggle.  However, when former President P.W. Botha of South Africa had a stroke in 1990, his replacement, Fredrick Willem de Klerk released Mandela.  President de Klerk released Mandela.  In 1994, after a series of negotiations with President Klerk, Mandela was elected the first black president of South Africa (“bio”).  Mandela tried to unify South Africa and encourage forgiveness among the people.  Mandela could have held a grudge against the people who put in him prison in the first place, but instead he decided the best thing to do was to forgive them and encourage other people to forgive others. 
Matthew 18:21-22 says, “Peter came to Jesus and asked, ‘Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother when he sins against me?  Up to seven times?’  Jesus answered, ‘I tell you not seven times, but seventy-seven times,” (Bible Across America 1698).  Jesus didn’t specifically mean we should forgive someone only seventy-seven times, and then not forgive them the seventy-eighth time.  He was saying we should always forgive someone, no matter what he or she does to us or to God.  Martin Luther says in his sermon that, “Christ does not say, ‘because of your sins you must fast this much or pray this much or donate this much or do this or that.’  Rather does he say, ‘if you would render satisfaction and atone for your guilt and wipe out your sins, listen to my advice, yes, to my command.  The only thing for you to do is to forgive and to renew your heart…As long as you forgive, all will be well,” (Luther 65). 
The Old Testament story of Jacob and his twin brother, Esau, found in Genesis 25-33, provides another example.  Esau, the “manly man,” came in one day from the fields.  He asked Jacob to make him some food.  Jacob, who was “Mr. Mom,” sold Esau some beans in exchange for the larger inheritance.  When their father, Isaac, was dying, Isaac ordered two deer to be killed and eaten before dividing up the inheritance.  Jacob and their mother deceived Isaac into giving Jacob the larger inheritance (which involved filleting the flesh of the deer and putting it on Jacob’s hands).  Jacob ended up having to run for his life to a foreign land.  Many years passed before Jacob returned to his home, before God told Jacob to return to his homeland.  When he did, his brother, Esau, came running at him and hugged and kissed him.  Esau had forgiven his brother.
In 1543 Martin Luther made mention of the Judensau, or Jew Pig, at Wittenberg.  The Judensau is usually a depiction of Jews in various disgusting activities involving swine.  These Judensau are considered anti-Semitic.  The Nazis revived the Judensau in the late 1930s.  As we all know, the Nazis tragically exterminated millions of Jews in the early part of the 20th century.  A most surprising thing happened in 1988 when a debate began on whether to remove the Judensau that is located at the Wittenberg church because of the horrible nature the Jews faced fifty years before.  Consequently, a bronze plaque was placed in the pavement of the walkway memorializing the death and torture of the Jews under the name of God (Lopez).  The Jewish community believes it’s very important to forgive someone because God doesn’t forgive our sins until we forgive those who have sinned against us (which sounds familiar) (Graubart).  The Jewish community forgave the Germans by permitting them to leave the sculpture up, but also installing a bronze plaque to memorialize the millions of deaths the Jews faced under the Christians.  This plaque also states that Germans and Jews today are tolerant of each other and respectful of each other (Winkler).  It’s very ironic that Martin Luther seemed to have some very anti-Semitic views.  He believed all Jews needed to be banished from Christian society (Trachtenberg 219). 
It’s very dangerous to assume that we are without sin.  1 John 1:8 states, “If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us.  If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness,” (Bible Across America 2151).  Those who do not worship fall into this sort of deceit.  We as humans cannot recover knowing ourselves unless we know God (Simcox 74).  At the conclusion of this paper, we will discuss the importance to reciting the Lord’s Prayer regularly.
The sixth petition, “Lead us not into temptation,” is pretty self-explanatory.  We pray to God to not let us fall back on our sins anymore.  There are two types of temptations (or trials as Luther calls it).  The first temptation is the “left hand” temptation, or the one that incites us to have anger, hatred, and impatience.  The most famous story about impatience in the Bible is the when the people of Moses were wandering the wilderness for forty years.  During those forty years, Moses’ patience was tested many times.  Moses said in Exodus 16:8, “’You will know that it was the Lord when he gives you meat to eat in the evening and all the bread you want in the morning, because he has heard your grumbling against him,’” (Bible Across America 134).  The “right hand” temptation is one of unchastity, lust, pride, and greed.  These ideas come from Psalm 91:7, which states that a thousand men may fall at the left hand, but ten thousand fall at the right hand. 
Later, in the Personal Prayer Book (which was published after his excommunication from the Catholic Church), Luther states that there are three temptations: of the flesh, of the world, and of the devil.  He prays to God to help people not overeat (sin of gluttony), not get drunk, not sleep too much, or be lazy: all of these are sins of the flesh.  He prays to God to protect us from seeking honor and power on the earth.  He even asks God to keep us from getting into positions of power.  Does Luther pray that we should not seek positions in government offices?  Shouldn’t there be some sort of hierarchy or order?  Without some sort of government, there would be anarchy.  Luther was not stating this.  He was referring to the honor and the “messiah” complex or the “god” complex that some people in authority positions get when they have been in a position of power for a long time. 
Erwin Kurth, in his book called Catechetical Helps, wrote that temptation is a test put upon us by God to prove and improve our strength.  “A weight is attached to a rope, not to break it, but to prove it.  Pressure is applied to a boiler, not to burst it, but to certify its power of resistance.  Temptations are intended to do more than merely prove; they are meant to improve,” (Kurth 129).
The very last petition, “but deliver us from evil,” sums up the entire Lord’s Prayer.  Luther says in his sermon that, “we should pray for deliverance from evil so that trials [or temptations] and sin may cease and that God’s will may be done, and his kingdom come,” (Luther 76).  In Luther’s Personal Prayer Book, he states, “Deliver us… in death and on Judgment Day, from your severe condemnation,” (Tunseth 53).  He goes on to pray to God to protect us from sudden death, fire and flood, lighting, hail, hunger, famine, war, and bloodshed.  He asks God to protect us from plagues, pestilence, disease, and other sicknesses.
It’s very important to say this prayer in church, since it’s from Scripture, and that Jesus, who is God in the flesh, gave it to his disciples to pray.  The Lord’s Prayer is God’s own way of showing us how to pray.  These things give us a glimpse of what is in Jesus’ mind, and how important they are compared to other things Jesus believes (Golloday 156).  The entire Lord’s Prayer seems to push you forward as you recite it (Schramm 133). 
Our Father who art in heaven,
hallowed be thy name.
Thy kingdom come.
Thy will be done
on earth as it is in heaven.
Give us this day our daily bread,
and forgive us our trespasses,
as we forgive those who trespass against us,
and lead us not into temptation,
but deliver us from evil.
For thine is the kingdom,
and the power, and the glory,
for ever and ever.
Amen.
Each line seems to push you toward the next one, and finally ending with the word, Amen, which means, “verily,” or, “Yes, Lord, let it be so.”  It seems to have a poetic feel to it, and is generally portrayed as an ancient poem.  The meter is irregular, but if set correctly, it could be sung. 
One should note that the final three lines of the Lord’s Prayer aren’t actually petitions, since they didn’t come from Christ himself.  These lines seem to come from 1 Chronicles 29:11, which says, “Yours, O Lord, is the greatness and the power and the glory and the majesty and the splendor, for everything in heaven and earth is yours,” (Bible Across America 816).  A common theme in Chronicles is that God is portrayed as a king (Harper Collins Study Bible 644), and this verse very clearly shows this.  The worshipping community added this to the Lord’s Prayer.  We should be careful, however, not to dismiss this last portion (Simcox 104).  It is a very valuable part of the prayer, and even brings a nice refreshing ending to a prayer of pleading.
The Lord’s Prayer is simple, easy to memorize, and very important to the life of Christians.  As mentioned before, Jesus himself gave this prayer to humans to recite, tweak, and pray to God.  Martin Luther made this prayer much easier to understand throughout his ministry.  Without him, who knows how we would be interpreting this Lord’s Prayer today.




Works Cited
Bible Across America. New International Version. Grand Rapids. Zondervan, 2008, Print.
Graubart, Jean. "A Jewish Perspective on Forgiveness." Journey Films. Fezter Institute, n.d. Web. 4 Apr 2012. <http://www.journeyfilms.com/files/A Jewish Perspective on Forgiveness.pdf>.

Golloday, Roberto. Sermons On The Catechism: The Lord's Prayer. Columbus: Lutheran Book Concern, 1921. 155-67. Print.
Harper Collins Study Bible. 1 ed. Wayne A. Meeks. London: HarperCollins Publishers 1989. Print.

"Judensau." Zionism and Israel - Encyclopedic Dictionary. Zionism and Israel Information Center, 10 Mar 2009. Web. 4 Apr 2012. <http://www.zionism-israel.com/dic/Judensau.htm>.

Kurth, Erwin. Catechetical Helps. 4th. New York: The Studio Press, 1935. 129. Print.
Lopez, Billie. Traveler's guide to Jewish Germany. Pelican Publishing, 1998. Web. <http://books.google.com/books?id=WDnbzk4-BmkC&pg=PA259

Luther, Martin. "An Exposition of the Lord's Prayer." Luther's Works. 42. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1969. 19-81. Print.

__________. "The Small Catechism." Concordia. Ed. Paul Timothy McCain. Pocket. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2006. 452. Print.

__________. "Personal Prayer Book." Praying For Reform. Ed. Scott Tunseth. Augsburg Fortress Press: Minneapolis, 2005. 25. Print.

"Luther's Relationship with the Jews." A Mighty Fortress Is Our God: Martin Luther. KDG Wittenberg, 07 July 2003. Web. 4 Apr 2012.  <http://www.luther.de/en/kontext/juden.html>.

"Nelson Mandela Biography-Facts, Life, Birthday, Life Story." bio. A&E Television Networks, LLC, n.d. Web. 3 Apr 2012. <http://www.biography.com/people/nelson-mandela-9397017?page=4>.

Schramm, W.E. What Lutherans Believe. Columbus: The Lutheran Book Concern, Print.
Simcox, Carroll E. Living The Lord's Prayer: A Study of Basic Christianity. New York: Morehouse-Gorham Co., 1951. Print.

Tanner, Henry. "POPE IS SHOT IN CAR IN VATICAN SQUARE; SURGEONS TERM CONDIION; TURK, AN ESCAPED MURDERER, IS SEIZED 'GUARDED'; 2 BULLETS HIT PONTIFF." New York Times 14 May 1981, n. pag. Web. 2 Apr. 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/1981/05/14/world/pope-shot-car-vatican-square-surgeons-term-condiion-turk-escaped-murderer-seized.html>.

Trachtenberg, Joshua. The Devil and The Jews. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1943. 219. Print.

United States. USDA. Pyramid Servings: How Much? How Many?. Web. <http://www.fns.usda.gov/tn/Resources/nibbles/pyramid_servings.pdf>.

Winkler, Matthias. "A Medieval Trace of German Anti-Judaism." DW n.d., n. pag. Web. 9 Apr. 2012. <http://www.dw.de/dw/article/0,,1537282,00.html>.