Social Icons

Showing posts with label judge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label judge. Show all posts

Sunday, May 20, 2012

Congressman Gipson and the Separation of Church and State

Congressman Andy Gipson of Mississippi recently used the famous Leviticus 20:13 verse in an attempt to justify his beliefs.  The Huffington Post erroneously wrote an article stating that Andy Gipson is calling for the death of gays and lesbians.  I have to say that this is not correct.  Andy Gipson is erroneously using this passage to further his own agenda....not to call for genocide.

I looked up Congressman Gipson's email address because I wanted to express my concerns to him in a polite way, so I sent him this email.




Dear Congressman Gipson,

Please carefully and prayerfully consider what I have written in this email.

Since you are a politician and a worker in a SECULAR institution, I believe you should keep your faith and religion out of your secular work.   If the United States Government were to be a sacred institution, our democracy would in fact be called a Theocracy, much like that of Iran or of ancient Hebrews.

However, I do have to point out the error in your judgment.

The Old Testament became moot the second Christ died on the cross.  The laws in Leviticus are from something called the Holiness Code, which was written for the children of Israel.  Christians do not need to follow these laws.

Jesus said he came here to fulfill the law and prophets.  We are to follow the words of Jesus.  Not the words Moses wrote in Leviticus.  Moses is dead.  Christ took over, and he still reigns today.

Reread Matthew 7 all the way through.  Ask yourself, "Who said this?" Then you can decide whether or not it's your place to judge someone.

It probably shames and saddens God that humans have ridiculed, taunted, teased, beaten, raped, and murdered homosexuals.  These things are hateful and wrong and anyone who does these things in the name of Jesus need to repent right NOW.

One of the bad things about we Christians is that we put sins in an order.  We put several sins in groups and put them in order of how bad we think they are.....ALL sins are bad and need equal treatment.  Not just homosexuality.

Sir, might I ask, what are your sins?

My sins include, but are not limited to, these.

  1. lust
  2. greed
  3. anger
  4. arrogance
  5. bitterness
  6. condemnation
  7. doubting God’s presence (this is a big one for me)
  8. hate
  9. selfishness
  10. swearing
  11. ungratefulness
  12. disobeying God’s will
  13. worshipping false idols (another big one for me)
  14. sexual immorality

All these are just as bad as (and sometimes worse than) homosexuality.

Congressman, I do hope you look back at your remarks and see how you have hurt so many people.  Please ask God to help you and to forgive you.

Thank you for taking time out of your busy schedule to read this.

Jesse



I completely forgot a very important point though.  I forgot to mention that I do not think he was calling for the killing of thousands of people.  I knew what he was trying to say, but his choice of words and Biblical verses were wrong.  

I sincerely and whole-heartedly believe everything I said in my email to Mr. Gipson.  I believe that our morals are different from the morals of Moses' time.  I believe that Jesus came here to take our sins away.  I believe that ALL sins are bad, not just the cherry-picked ones that are easy to fight.  I believe in respect and tolerance for ALL human beings, no matter what race, religion, political party, sexual orientation, and gender orientation.  I believe Matthew 7 is one of the most important chapters in the Bible because it tells us not to do the one thing that humans are known to do the most; judge.

I'm sorry to inform you, but the Holy Bible is not United States Law.

Friday, April 27, 2012

My Many Jesuses

[This paper is the final for my Jesus Through The Ages class at Capital University, where I am seeking a minor degree in religion.]
Jesse Harmon
RELIG 210
May 1, 2012
The Many “Jesuses”
            My favorite prayer of all time is this: “Help!”  This is the prayer that I usually say throughout the day.  I know that God is there to help me and that Jesus was there to take my sins away.  Jesus was divine, and yet, so human.  I am not a perfect person.  I’m very far from it.  I have major flaws that affect my relationship with God.  I have many demons that affect my relationship with people.  I pray to God to help me get past these flaws and demons and be a good person and a good friend.  I will be assessing the various “Jesuses” (a term I heard before class once) that are known throughout the ages, and then I will give my views on them.  In this paper, I will be describing my views on Jesus.
            Everyone teaches and everyone learns.  Jesus was the ultimate teacher.  His morals were very progressive and controversial for his time.  He taught things like love your neighbor, love your enemy, and love God.  Thomas Jefferson’s book called, The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth, is a compilation of the four gospels cut up and pasted together into a new story of Jesus.  Jefferson’s book says, “[Jesus said,] ‘How much then is a man better than a sheep?  Wherefore it is lawful to do well on the Sabbath days,’ And he said, ‘The Sabbath was made for man, and not the man for the Sabbath.’  Then the Pharisees went out and held a council against him…” (Jefferson).
            I am reminded of Mark chapter 7.  In it, Mark talks about the ceremonial washing of the hands.  Jesus and his disciples were eating without washed hands.  The Pharisees and teachers asked Jesus why they didn’t wash their hands because it was suppose to be done according to tradition, and Jesus replied, “Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you hypocrites; as it is written, ‘These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me.  They worship me in vain; their teachings are but rules taught by men,’” (Bible Across America 1743).  Jesus then goes on to explain that we should follow God’s rules, and not man’s.  I guess this section sums up what the Anabaptists believed in the 1500s.  In a document called “Sixty-seven Theses,” Ulrich Zwingli said, “…all who consider other teachings equal to or higher than the gospel err, and do not know what the gospel is,” (Janz 189).  What does this mean?  Zwingli believed that anything not given by God in the Bible should not be in church.  There shouldn’t be any instruments in church that are not spoken of in the Bible, and that if something taught by humans isn’t in the Bible, it shouldn’t be taught at all.  I am a strong believer in having a liturgy in any worship service.  I support this by stating that many aspects of the liturgy are Biblically based.  For example, the Lord’s Prayer is comprised of sections from both Matthew 6:9-13, and 1 Chronicles 29:11.  I remember going to a non-denominational mega church in Columbus a few years ago, and they didn’t even recite the Lord’s Prayer, a prayer given to us by Jesus as a model for prayer, as well as a prayer to recite regularly.  I was actually offended that this worship service at this mega church did not recite this.  It is such an easy prayer to memorize, and the actual words and phrases themselves seem to propel you forward toward that final Amen.  I guess I just have a problem with the contemporary worship style that is very popular today.  I have actually debated with, and even started yelling at, people because of my views on the contemporary church, (I’ve even lost a friend because of it).  I know I shouldn’t, for any noise is pleasing to God’s ears. 
            Jesus is a lover, not a fighter.  Jesus said to love your enemies.  Luke 6:35 says, “…love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back.  They your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked.  Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful,” (Bible Across America 1788).  A famous logic puzzle goes like this: A friend of a friend is a friend, and an enemy of an enemy is a friend.  A friend of an enemy is an enemy, and the enemy of a friend is an enemy.  Jesus turns this logic completely backwards.  What he is saying here is the enemy is a friend in the first place.  Jesus states at the Sermon on the Mount that anger is the same as murder.  This was completely turned around from what people were taught up to that point in time.  How can anger be the same as taking someone’s life?  I still find this hard to comprehend, since I do have quite a temper.  I hold grudges against people.  I still hold a grudge against someone from middle school that did nothing but harass me and insult me in front of others.  I know I shouldn’t, but I do.
If we follow Jesus’ logic, how can the anger of the nations of our world be justified?  I don’t think it can.  Iran is a current threat against Israel.  North Korea and South Korea are at odds with each other (again).  Sudan is bombing border towns of South Sudan as I type this paper (CNN Wire Staff).  Of course Jesus did say that there would always be wars.  I don’t like it though.  Jesus came to be a Prince of Peace.  Jesus did not refer to himself as the Prince of Peace, but a book in the Old Testament did.  Isaiah 9:6 says, “For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders.  And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace,” (Bible Across America 1212).  Why didn’t Jesus refer to himself as this?  He was human, and he felt emotion.  Jesus expressed his outrage at the vendors in the temple, and he went through and flipped the tables and cast everyone out.  I don’t see flipping tables as a sign of peace.  That was a violent act.
            At the beginning of the year, I discussed a lot about the stained glass windows I saw at my church, but I mistakenly forgot to delve into what they were of.  The big stained glass window at the back of the church (standing about 20 feet high) used to be the entryway into the church until the present belfry and vestibule was built.  This image shows Jesus on the cross with the Mary Magdalene, Mary (James’ mother), and Mary of Cleopas.  The image is a typical crucifix, with a Jesus hanging limp on the perfectly built cross, with a blue or green sash around his waist.  Only recently have I come to realize the kind of pain that Jesus was in when he was crucified.  An image was shown in class of a South American Jesus screaming on a cross.  This picture is shown in a Brazilian church, which is very surprising.  I still have trouble understanding a painting of such pain and physical torment being shown in such a holy place.  I am reminded of this after watching The Passion Of The Christ for my movie review paper.  That film was horrifying!  In the film, we could see the actual flesh being torn away from Jesus’ body, while in the Brazilian painting, we could see the agony that was expressed by Jesus’ face.
            As recently confirmed by my pastor, one of the main problems I have with the conservative church, such as the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, is that they preach mainly the idea that God is damning you.  I think this is a turn off to potential future members of the church, as seen by the 30-year decline of membership, although donations have increased (Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod).  The liberal church, such as the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, (which I am a member of), tends to preach nothing but, as my pastor once put it, the “cute bunnies and flowers” of Jesus.  There needs to be some sort of balance between the teachings of Jesus.  God is not our buddy.  He can’t be.  When our time comes, he will be the one to give us that final judgment that may or may not send us to hell.  It is very important to respect him.  I know that I will not be running up to Jesus and patting him on the back saying, “Hey dude! How’s it goin’?”  I will be bowing down at his feet asking for forgiveness of all of my sins.  I fear that many young people today are viewing Jesus as their best friend.  I’m worried that when judgment does come, they will be shocked to see that whom they were so hoping to spend time around a campfire with will be the same person who is telling them whether they are going to heaven or hell.  Yes, Jesus is a good guy.  He’s a teacher of morals.  He’s a healer of the sick.  He’s the guy to comfort me in time of pain and sorrow.  He’s the man who was a servant to human kind.  He’s the man to save me from my sins.  He’s the man who will eventually judge me…
            Stephen Colbert once said, “If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn't help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we've got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition and then admit that we just don't want to do it.”  Jesus was very supportive of helping the poor.  The parable of the Good Samaritan in Luke is a great example.  According to this parable, a man was attacked and robbed.  A priest and a Levite walked by this man and did nothing.  However, a Samaritan, a person from a group of people who broke away from Israel and God after the reign of Solomon, came up to the man and helped him out.  The Judeans, whom Jesus is a part of, generally looked down upon the Samaritans.  Why would a shunned person help out a Judean?  The reason is simple: love and kindness.  Jesus gives many examples of love and kindness, reflecting the idea of “Son Of Man” that he mainly refers himself to.  After telling his followers to go to the other side of a lake, Jesus said, “Foxes have holes and birds…have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head,” (Matthew 8:12) (Bible Across America 1672).  It’s interesting to note that in the Gospel of Thomas, Jesus says something very similar, although a little more poetic.  “Jesus said, “Foxes have their dens and birds have their nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay down and rest,” (Patterson).  A similar phrase is found in Luke 9:58.  What does this apparently common saying mean?  I googled “did Jesus have a permanent residence?” because I was curious as to what other people were thinking.  I found something that I already knew.  Jesus did not have a permanent residence, because this world is not his to stay, for he said in John 18:21, “My kingdom is not of this world.  If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jews.  But now my kingdom is from another place.” 
Why would Jesus say, “my servants”?  Let’s take a look at when Jesus washed his disciples’ feet.  John 13:5-10 says,
…he poured water into a basin and began to wash his disciples’ feet, drying them with the towel that was wrapped around him.  He came to Simon Peter, who said to him, “Lord, are you going to wash my feet?”  Jesus replied, “You do not realize now what I am doing, but later you will understand.”  “No,” Peter said, “you shall never wash my feet.”  Jesus answered, “Unless I wash you, you have no part with me,” (Bible Across America 1877).
 Washing the feet of someone seems to be something a servant would do.  I think it’s interesting to note how Peter was telling Jesus how to act.  Jesus then chastised him for doing so, stating that if Peter does not accept this, he will not be part of the kingdom.  Feet are very important in the Bible.  Jesus walked on water using his feet.  Moses walked on his feet when he was to encounter the burning bush.  Without feet, the statue that Nebuchadnezzar saw would have had stubs of clay instead.  We need feet to kick off the dust in areas where we are rejected.  Without feet, we would have no sole!  As you can see, feet are very important to Jesus.  They are the things that connect directly with the earth.
Jesus was a servant.  He was a good servant.  He was also a king.  He was the kind of king who would take care of and protect his tenants-in-chiefs, lords, and peasants in a feudal system.  In Luke 1:32-33, the angel Gabriel says to Mary, “[Your child] will be great and he will be called the Son of Man of the Most High.  The Lord God will give him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, his kingdom will never end,” (Bible Across America 1772).  I have always viewed Jesus as a king.  As I mentioned before, I would most likely not be giving Jesus piggyback rides and wrestling with him.  I would be at his feet trembling and asking for forgiveness of my sins.  The hymn “Crown Him With Many Crowns” shows the many Jesuses, paying close attention to the King of Kings.
Crown him with many crowns, the Lamb upon his throne
All hail him as thy matchless king, throughout eternity.
Crown him, ye kings, with many crowns for He is King of all.
I wrote my –now updated– verse to show my view on the “kingness” of Jesus.
Crown him the King of Kings, with power, evermore
Let every tongue on earth confess that Jesus Christ is Lord!
With faith, and only faith, let us be justified
Let every knee bow down and say, “All hail Him, Jesus Christ.”
The words, “crown,” “king,” “throne,” “hail,” and “knee bow down,” are all references to royalty.  Even Handel’s “Hallelujah Chorus” displays Jesus as king.
Hallelujah! 
For the Lord God Omnipotent reigneth.
And he shall reign forever and ever.
King of Kings, and Lord of Lords.
If done properly, the “Messiah” can be a majestic thing, which symbolizes the majesty that Jesus is.
            The following analogy may be quite a stretch.  I love the television show NCIS.  One of the most power series of episodes happened at the end of season 2 and the beginning of season 3.  Special Agent Leroy Jethro Gibbs (the protagonist) was in the process of getting up from the ground of a rooftop, with Special Agents Tony DiNozzo and Katelyn Todd also getting up.  A terrorist named Ari Haswari, sent to kill Gibbs, was at a building 600 yards away, and was aiming a sniper rifle (incidentally called a “Kate”) at the group.  He shot and killed agent Todd in the forehead after she stood up.  She was standing between Gibbs and DiNozzo, and she was the one shot.  This ended season 2.  At the beginning of season 3, Gibbs and his NCIS team are mourning the loss of agent Todd.  A new character is introduced named Ziva David.  After another episode, Ari found his way into Gibbs’ basement.  Gibbs went down in the basement, and was just about to be killed, when a shot rang out from the stairs.  Ziva David was the one who shot Ari.
            What’s the point of all of this?  Agent Todd could be seen as Adam and Eve, taking a bite of the forbidden fruit (taking the bullet in the head).  Ari could be seen as our sins and the serpent, and Gibbs could be seen as humans.  Ziva David (who happened to be the half-sister of Ari) could be seen as Jesus.  Ziva killed Ari, just like Jesus killed our sins.  Of course, the impact of our sins is still felt, just like the impact of the death of agent Todd is still felt to this current season.
            I believe 1 Corinthians 15 is the ultimate destination if someone wants to know why Jesus died.  Paul said to the people of Corinth, as seen in verses 2-4“…By this gospel you are saved, if you believed in vein.  For what I received when I passed on to you as of the first importance: that Christ died four our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures,” (Bible Across America 2012).  Paul then goes on to tell the Corinthians that we too will be raised from the dead.  No, our “immortal spirits” won’t be taken out of our bodies and flung into heaven with God.  Way back in Genesis, God breathed into dust and life came to Adam.  God will do the same to us today.  He will take our bodies –even those cremated –and breathe new life into them.
This isn’t a new idea.  The oldest book of the Bible, Job, states, “I know that my Redeemer lives and that in the end he will stand upon the earth.  And after my skin has been destroyed, yet in my flesh I will see God,” (Bible Across America 975).  The term “immortal spirit” appears nowhere in the Bible, much to many people’s surprise.  Do we have a spirit?  Of course we do, but it’s not immortal, (sorry Thich Nhat Hanh).  Jesus just appeared after being raised from the dead.  He does not constrain to the physical aspects of humans such as walking through doors.  When we die, we turn into ash.  God will breathe to us new life into that ash, (ashes to ashes; dust to dust).  “When the last trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable [or incorruptible] and we will be changed.  For the perishable must clothe itself with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality.”  When this is done, “death [will be] swallowed up in victory,” (Bible Across America 2024). 
As seen here, there are many Jesuses that affect all of humanity, including me.  I think all of these images still speak to the human race.  While Jesus isn’t our buddy, he is our teacher, lover, king, Lord, prince of peace, and most importantly, savior.  After analyzing my view of Jesus while writing this paper, I guess I could add one more image of Jesus.  He seems to be like a big brother.  He will love you, but he will let you know when you’ve done wrong.  He will protect you, but he will rough you up if needed be.   When all is said and done, two verses pretty much sum up my faith, and they come from 1 Corinthians 15:57-58.  “[Thanks] be to God!  He gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.  Therefore, my dear brothers, stand firm.  Let nothing move you.  Always give yourselves fully to the work of the Lord, because you know that your labor in the Lord is not in vein,” (Bible Across America 2024).


Works Cited
Bible Across America. New International Version. Grand Rapids. Zondervan, 2008, Print.

CNN Wire Staff, . "Witness: Sudanese warplanes strike at South Sudan border towns." CNN. Turner Broadcasting Systems, Inc., 23 Apr 2012. Web. 24 Apr 2012. 
<http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/23/world/africa/sudans-conflict/index.html?hpt=wo_c2>.

Janz, Denis, ed. Zwingli, Sixty-seven Theses. 2nd ed. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2008. 189. Print.

Jefferson, Thomas. The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth. 1. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1903. Print.

Patterson, Stephen, ed. "The "Scholars' Translation" of the Gospel of Thomas." Misericordia University. Misericordia University, n.d. Web. 24 Apr 2012.

"Synod membership declines, giving increases." Synod membership declines, giving increases. Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, 13 Oct 2010. Web. 23 Apr 2012. <http://reporter.lcms.org/pages/rpage.asp?NavID=17865>.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Why We Must Not Judge Others

One of the things that really bothers me about Christians is the fact that they all judge one another.  There is a very dear friend of mine here at Capital who I would classify as a fundamentalist.  This person always seems to be judging me whenever I bring up a religious topic to talk about.  He has this 'holier-than-thou' complex about him.  I visited a Buddhist temple a few months ago for a religion class, and he asked me why I went there instead of a church of a different denomination.  I responded by saying I wanted to experience another faith.

For example, whenever I bring up the issue of homosexuality in the church, he always gets very offensive and condemns those who are homosexual.  It bothers me when people condemn homosexuals because while Christians claim that homosexuality is a choice, science suggests otherwise.  As we all know, science is basically the explanation of how the world works.  I am reminded about a paper I did in Psychology about a year and a half ago.  Several professors here had a debate and Q&A session about homosexuality.  It was rather fascinating.  Here is the a review of the session below.




Jesse Harmon
Psych 110
Dr. Torello
November 5, 2010
The Biology of Homosexuality
            Homosexuality is, according to the Oxford Dictionary, “sexually attracted to people of one's own sex.”  The panel held at the Capital University Bridge of Learning lecture hall on November 4, 2010 at 7:30pm.  The moderator that night was a Capital University senior seeking a religion major, with Dr. Torello, Dr. Broh, and Dr. Anderson sitting on the panel.  Dr. Torello has a doctorate degree in biological psychology from The Ohio State University.  Dr. Broh has a Ph.D in sociology from The Ohio State University.  Dr. Anderson has a Ph.D in Zoology from Miami University.  This paper is a summery of what happened during the debate.
            The first question asked to the panel was if there were any differences between the brains of a homosexual man and a heterosexual man.  Dr. Torello responded that the hypothalamus of the brain is responsible for sexual behavior.  Simon LeVay, a neuroscientist, documented that the hypothalamus of a homosexual man resembles that of a heterosexual woman.  However, replications of LeVay’s studies failed to conclude this hypothesis.  LeVay again conducted this experiment, claiming that his hypothesis is correct, even though subsequent studies proved him wrong.  Years later, LeVay ‘came out of the closet’ as a homosexual himself, (which may or may not conclude that he made up his findings).   Other findings in the animal kingdom have found that 10% of male rams have hypothalamuses that are similar to those of female rams. 
            Heredity was the next question in the discussion.  Dr. Anderson stated that a 1993 study concluded that a ‘gay gene’ has been found.  However, after reviewing and attempting to reproduce the study in 1999, other scientists proved this theory false.  There is no connection between the X-Chromosome that had looked different in homosexual males and sexual orientation.  However, the scientists in the 1999 study were unsure about how the original study was conducted, because families were excluded for various reasons such as the father being a homosexual himself.  The 1999 study was a much larger study, having about 450 participants, while the 1993 study had a lot less.
            Is a person born into his or her sexual preference, and how does one’s development express his or her sexual orientation?  Dr. Broh responded that studies cannot be replicated, and that scientist can only make assumptions.  Dr. Torello went on to explain that there is no ‘light switch’ effect, where someone can be completely homosexual or completely heterosexual; instead, there is a large spectrum, which can in fact be measured using the Kinsey Scale.  Are homosexuals born the way they are?  Dr. Torello seemed to infer that people could be born homosexual.  He mentioned a study done on lab rats.  A mother rat was injected with testosterone into her uterus, much more than naturally produced.  When the pups were born, their gender was recorded.  When the pups sexually matured, the female rats sometimes attempted to mate with other female rats.  When a mother rat was injected with estrogen, the male pups that were sexually mature attempted, in their own unique way, to mount other male rats.  This possibly concludes that the amounts of testosterone or estrogen in someone could affect their sexuality preference.
            Dr. Anderson mentioned that in the first part of the 20th century, scientists considered homosexuality as being a mental disorder.  In the 1970s, however, this idea was thrown out.  There used to be many ‘gay fixing’ clinics around the United States, but since the seventies, the amount has significantly dropped.
            Dr. Anderson also mentioned a study that concluded that if a mother has multiple male children, the probability that the younger male child will be homosexual goes up a third of a percent; meaning that there is a higher chance the ‘baby brother’ of the family will be homosexual than the oldest male child.  This may have to do with the fact that younger sons tend to weigh less than their older siblings.   According to the study, 1/7 of homosexual men in North America have an older brother.  This study does not conclude any correlation between homosexuality and if that male had an older sister.  This theory hasn’t been tested since.
            A question from a young man in the audience was brought up.  Does a father figure have any influence on the chance someone is homosexual?  Dr. Broh took this question.  She said there was no consistent evidence that a father figure has anything to do with a child being homosexual.  Dr. Anderson stated, however, that the age of the mother could determine if the child is homosexual or not.  The younger the mother, the more likely the child could be homosexual.   A mother is more likely to have maternal stress if she is having her first child, then she is if she’s having her third.  This maternal stress might altar the natal environment that the baby is in.  Dr. Torello mentioned a study done by John Money, at John Hopkins University, that homosexual males act the way they do because they have lower testosterone levels in their bodies.  Money received funds for his experiment where he injected self-described homosexual males with testosterone, thinking that he might be able to change their sexual orientation.  However, the testosterone had a surprising effect; instead of changing the subjects’ sexual orientation, the testosterone instead made them more attracted to the same gender.  Dr. Broh also agreed with the other two panelists when she stated that hormone levels vary in every human.  Some males may have higher estrogen levels than other males, and some females may have higher testosterone levels than other females.
            An audience member brought up a surprising question.  Could the image of homosexuality be changed?  Dr. Broh rhetorically asked the audience member what he considered homosexuality.  Is the image based on appearance, behavior, sexual preference, or some other variable?  The identity of someone cannot be change.  Calling someone homosexual is a very vague description, according to Dr. Broh.  This question shocked me as well as a few other audience members because it seemed to have nothing to do with what this forum was about.
            Another unexpected question came from an audience member.  This question pertained to a statistic that Dr. Torello mentioned earlier in the discussion.  Dr. Torello mentioned that on average, ten-year-old boys know whom they are going to be attracted to later in life.  This audience member questioned Dr. Torello’s statement by saying that at the age of four, he was going to like females.  Low chatter began around the room as Dr. Torello attempted to clarify what he stated earlier, that on average, boys at the age of ten know whom they are going to be attracted to.
            The discussion went another route.  What is the home life versus the social impact on sexuality?  Dr. Broh said that children being raised in a single parent home, (single mothers or single fathers), has NO correlation to the outcome of a child’s sexual attractions.  Instead, if homosexual parents raise a child, there is a slight increase in the probability that the child will be homosexual, compared to a child being raised by a heterosexual family.  She concluded that the child who is raised by the homosexual family would have a larger range of choices in sexuality compared to a child raised by a heterosexual family. However, she stated that this has nothing to do with sexual orientation. 
            Could homosexuals deny their own sexuality? Dr. Torello said it’s possible.  Could someone be one hundred percent gay, or one hundred percent straight?  Again, the panel states that there is a spectrum on sexuality.  If someone was one hundred percent gay, they would most likely detest members of the opposite gender.
            What could be done to combat campus negativity toward homosexuality?  The panel discussed that with information collected, and if in fact an answer could be found about biology having anything to do with homosexuality, it could be used to help with the equal rights movement, and with anti-discrimination classes. 
             A question was brought up about ‘fixing’ homosexuality.  Dr. Torello quickly stated that homosexuality, “[is] not broken.”  A better question would have been, “If someone was homosexual, and they didn’t want to be homosexual, is there a way to ‘change’ them to be heterosexual?”
            There has been rigorous testing on male homosexuals, but not so much on female homosexuals.  The behavior of males tends to be more scrutinized than the behavior of females.  If two females hug, society sees it as perfectly normal.  However, if two males hug, some parts of society see it as being abnormal, wrong, or strange.  Dr. Torello asked the audience, if two females can hug, why can’t two males?
            The final thoughts on the three panelists summed everything up. Dr. Anderson stated that there are a lot of hypotheses and that a lot of testing still needs to be done.  Dr. Broh stated that sexuality is fixed at a certain point, and that nature versus nurture is a battle that needs to be solved.  The ‘way they are’ and ‘who they are’ is more important about ‘how they got there.’  Dr. Torello states, what does it matter?  What does it matter if we’re Italian, black, white, Jewish, or homosexual?  Some say that if we pray hard enough, our sexuality would change.  Dr. Torello states that God can’t change us. 
            A lot of work still could be done on the biological effects on homosexuality.  Why? There are much bigger issues to worry about such as cancer, diabetes, and other diseases that affect peoples’ lives much more tremendously than a sexual orientation.  In conclusion, sexuality is probably biological, but we still don’t know.  Will we ever figure it out?  Maybe, but maybe not.



I am reminded of several verses from the Bible.

Matthew 7:1, "Do not judge, or you too will be judged."  

Luke 6:37, "Do not judge, and you will not be judged.  Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned.  Forgive, and you will be forgiven."  

I have a serious problem with bullying, not only in school, but in society.  Read this article.  This is unacceptable.  As someone who has attempted suicide in the past, I find this appalling.  As mentioned in the article, for 13 year old Brittany, 7th grade was absolute hell.  It was also a nasty time for me.  I heard nothing but teasing from the kids in my class not only toward me, but toward other students.  I still have trouble respecting some of my classmates, which is probably why I don't contact them very much.  The things they said were just awful, and Logan-Hocking Middle School did nothing about it.

But I forgive them.  I've come to the conclusion that what I've experience exasperated my mental illness to this day.  I had a really thin skin, but it's grown thicker.  I'm now able to take that kind of thing, but it still bothers me.

John 8:7, "When they kept on questioning [Jesus], he straightened up and said to them, 'if any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her."

I find it appalling that people within the church are condemning homosexuality, saying it's a sin.  The act of homosexuality is a sin.  We are ALL sinners.  EVERY SINGLE ONE OF US is a sinner.

Romans 14:10, "You, then, why do you judge your brother?  Or why do you look down on your brother?  For we will all stand before God's judgement seat.

As my friends know, I believe divorce to be a terrible thing, worse than the act of homosexuality.  Divorce splits apart families.  Of course there are some obviously good excuses to get divorced, such as spousal abuse, but if two people are getting divorced just to get divorced, that's not right. Divorce is not traditional family values.


The word abomination that's used in the Bible can be translated from many different words.  It does not convey the same meaning as we see it today.  Today, we see the definition of abomination as something that should be banned.  However, back in the day, abomination was seen as something just simply disliked.

1 Corinthians 4:5, "Therefore judge nothing before the appointed time; wait till the Lord comes. He will bring to light what is hidden in darkness and will expose the motives of men's hearts. At that time each will receive his praise from God."

It's not our job here on earth to judge others.  It's the Almighty God's job.  I have sinned.  I will be judged.  I have this immense fear that I will not be good enough to enter heaven because of my sins.

You may say that what I say here is blasphemy.  Go ahead.  Kick me out of the church.  I double-dog dare you.

It's what I believe.  Is the act of homosexuality a sin? Yes.  Is the homosexual person a sinner? Yes, but I'm a sinner, and you are a sinner as well.  Is homosexuality a sin?  No.

To all my homosexual friends, I love you all.  You are all very special to me.  Everyone is special to me.  May God grant you peace in your lives and be safe on your quests to find true love.