Social Icons

Featured Posts

Sunday, December 21, 2014

When Would I Join The Roman Catholic Church?

I went to a Roman Catholic Church last Sunday during their Latin Mass.  It was strange for an old school Lutheran to go there.  After spending some time reflecting on where I am in my faith journey, I thought about reasons why I won't be joining the Catholic church any time soon.


  1. Papal infallibility: I do not believe in the infallibility of the Pope.  I believe he is a mere mortal, just like the rest of us.  I believe he has sinned in his past, is sinning, and will sin again.  Although I realize that the idea of papal infallibility was only a recent dogma as the mid 1880s, it still grinds my gears to see other people believe that a human can be considered perfect.
  2. Adding new ideas to the faith pot: By this I mean when the RCC suddenly "discovers" something, and adds it to the list of things that you have to absolutely believe in in order to be saved, even if there is no scriptural evidence.  For example, I don't believe Mary was perpetually a virgin. 
  3. Mary: was a human being, and a sinner.  There needs to be a greater line between the veneration of Mary and the savior Jesus.  It's like this.  Imagine you are stranded in a desert, and there was a single tree in the desert, let's say, an orange tree.  You take the orange, and eat it, saving your life.  The tree (Mary) didn't save your life.  The orange (Jesus) did save your life.  You didn't eat the tree, you ate the orange.  (I realize not all metaphors are perfect).
  4. More emphasis on Jesus: as our savior.
  5. Only forgiven when confessing to a priest: If I'm wrong, please point it out for me.  I believe that you don't have to receive forgiveness through a priest.
  6. Praying/veneration to the saints: I only pray to God.  It also denies me being a saint.
  7. Closed communion: This is why I'll never be a Misery Synod Lutheran or a Wisconsinless Lutheran.
  8. Denying the "priesthood of believers:" 
  9. Traditioooooooon! Tradition! When tradition becomes theology, that's a problem.  Sola scriptura.
  10. Salvation through good works: It's STILL a problem.  Justification is a free gift.
  11. Cover up of sex scandals:  It denies a basic human needs, and sexually frustrates men.

This list isn't perfect.  There are probably ten arguments against each point I just made ("Well, you celebrate Christmas on December 25th.  That's not in the Bible.").

What would I need to become a Catholic?  A belief that I may have disagreements with the Church, and still be considered a member of the Church.

Monday, November 17, 2014

On Paul Elhard's Memorial Service

My spiritual mentor, former pastor, and great friend, passed away last Wednesday night.  I received the news the next morning from a phone call from my mother.  I remember nonchalantly saying, "Oh that's terrible."  Every time I get devastating news like this, it takes a long time for it to hit me.

It didn't really hit me that Paul's death actually happened until I was driving down to Athens, Ohio, today to attend the memorial service.  I nearly crashed when I realized that he was gone for good.  There will be no more friendly, funny, stubborn Pastor Paul.  I got angry.  I got very angry.  I don't know what I got angry at.  But I directed my anger toward God.  Pastor Paul had a kidney/pancreas transplant a few years back, and was forced to retire from the pastoral ministry at St. Matthew Lutheran Church in Logan, Ohio.  He was still an active member of the Christian community.  He was even seeking a doctorate degree at Trinity Lutheran Seminary in Columbus, Ohio.  He was very sick for a very long time, and it took its toll on his body.  His mind was still strong though.  I figured that since he survived the transplant, and the heart attack a few years later, he could survive anything.  This was why I was angry.  Pastor Paul survived two devastating heath setbacks, but dies randomly and out of the blue...

I cursed God, yelling at him...telling him how I hated what was done.  Then I remembered the most impactful thing that Pastor Paul ever said.  It was August in 2011, at another funeral for Sarah Starner, a young woman in the Logan community that died after battling leukemia for about ten years.  Pastor Paul was giving a eulogy for her when he said this, "It's perfectly okay to be angry with God, because God is big enough to take your anger, and still love you."

If there was one thing I learned from Pastor Paul, it's that God is big and so loving, that he will take our anger and deal with it in a loving, kind, way.

Rest in Peace, Pastor Paul.


Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Mommy, I’m Sad: A Depressed Person’s Spiritual Development

 Jesse Harmon
RELIG 381
Professor Tousley
April 28, 2014
Mommy, I’m Sad: A Depressed Person’s Spiritual Development
            When I was a child, about 5 or 6, I remember playing outside one day.  At certain times of the year in Hocking County, Ohio, where I grew up, there would be these little black and brown fuzzy caterpillars that come out.  When you touch these fuzzy caterpillars, they quickly curl up into a tight ball in self-defense. I decided that I was going to capture one of these fuzzy caterpillars and keep if forever.  When I caught one, I put it into a container and took it inside.  I brought some sticks, grass, and leaves for the caterpillar to climb on.  I put those in the container as well.  I played with it for a while, then left to go do something else.

Monday, April 21, 2014

Euthanasia: An Analysis


Jesse Harmon
RELIG 430
Dr. Bryant
April 11, 2014
Euthanasia: An Analysis
            Dax Cowart.  Terry Schaivo.  Tony Nicklinson.  Dianne Pretty.  These are all cases involving something called Euthanasia.  Euthanasia today means “mercy killing.”
            Dax Cowart, a 25 year old man in 1973, was involved in a serious car incident when his car exploded after coming in contact with a leaking underground gas line.  Cowart was burned on nearly two-thirds of his body.  A farmer happened upon him.  Cowart was in so much pain, he pleaded with the farmer to take a gun and kill him.  The farmer refused.  Cowart was transported to a hospital in Dallas, where he was questioned for nearly six hours without pain medication being administered to him.   After the six-hour ordeal, he asked the hospital physicians to not treat him, as he wanted to die.  Although he was considered fully capable of consent to his treatment, or lack thereof, his mother and lawyer decided to go ahead with treatment.  For several weeks, he was dunked in a bath of bleach to peel off his dead skin, leaving bare muscle and even bare bone.  Cowart passed away a few years, ago, but after his ordeal at the Dallas hospital, he became a lawyer and fought for victims’ rights.  Although he lived a happy life, he still wished that he were left to die in the hospital.  Our questions are these: Why did the farmer not shoot Cowart dead?  Why did the physicians at the hospital refuse to comply with a perfectly mentally capable man with his wishes to not be treated?  Our questions, which are specific, can be broadened.  Is euthanasia ethical?  Is euthanasia moral?  What does God think about euthanasia?  What does society think about euthanasia?  Is euthanasia the murder of someone, or the killing of someone?
            What does death mean in the Bible?  We must first determine what the difference is between murder and killing.  For simplicity’s sake, in this paper, murder will be considered an illegal act of intentional death upon someone else.  Killing will be considered a legal act of intentional death upon someone else.  Suicide is the act of causing the death of oneself. 
            Ecclesiastes 7:17 says, “Do not be [excessively wicked], and do not be a fool—why die before your time?”  In this poem or song in Ecclesiastes, we see that the author is telling the audience what he has seen in his “meaningless life” (7:15).  The author has seen the “righteous perishing in their righteousness,” and the over righteous destroying themselves.  He also sees the excessively wicked taking of ones own life.  This may seem like it applies to suicide, and it does.  Still, asking for a physician to take one’s own life is still suicide.  This is called Physician Assisted Death, or PAD.  When a patient or a proxy asks a doctor or non-physician to assist in his or her death, the doctor or non-physician, if he or she complies, will administer a way of death (Couthan 8).
            In Ecclesiastes 8:8, it says, “As no one has power over the wind to contain it, so no one has power over the time of their death.”  This verse seems to state that no one will able to predict their time of death, nor should they have any power over it.  This can reflect when Jesus said that even he doesn’t know the time or day the world will end.  The death of all of us is in accord with God’s plan.  When someone wants to kill him or herself, they are breaking God’s plan. 
            The New International Version of Genesis 9:6 says, “Whoever sheds human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made mankind.”  Maybe the New Living Translation is an easier translation, “If anyone takes a human life, that person’s life will also be taken by human hands.  For God made human beings in his own image.”
Again, this is referring to the murder of someone else, and not necessarily the killing of someone else.  Jesus says in Matthew 26:52 says, “Put your sword back in its place…for all who draw the sword will die by the sword.”  Again, Jesus may be talking about the murder of someone since he was being arrested at this point in the Garden of Gethsemane. 
            God will destroy the man who destroys the temple, or the body (1 Corinthians 3:16-17).  If anyone does damage to his or her own body willfully, God will destroy that person. 
            All these Bible verses may be fine and dandy, but none of them specifically address the issue of euthanasia.  Nowhere in the Bible does it say, “Thou shall not kill by euthanasia.”  But also, nowhere in the Bible does God command a physician to put to death a person who is suffering.  We commonly put animals to death because of their old age, sickness, severe injury, or severe pain.  Why don’t we do this to humans as well?  Let’s perform a thought experiment.  Say Fido has bladder cancer.  Fido is in suffering tremendously.  Fido’s owners don’t have enough money to get surgery for Fido.  Fido’s owners decide to put Fido down because it would be cheaper and Fido wouldn’t experience pain anymore.  Now, let’s say Grandma has bladder cancer as well.  Grandma is suffering tremendously.  Grandma’s caretakers don’t have enough money for cancer surgery.  Grandma’s caretakers don’t know what to do.  Grandma goes through surgery, radiation treatment, and chemotherapy.  Grandma is now suffering, but in a different way.  She’s cancer free, but still dealing with the effects of the chemotherapy.  Should the caretakers have put grandma down like the owners of Fido did?  Or should they let grandma suffer even more?  Should Fido’s owners put Fido through more suffering, or should they have put Fido down?  Should euthanasia even be a possibility? 
            What are the arguments for and against euthanasia?  First, there is the argument of rights.  Away from the Christian belief that we mentioned earlier that only God knows when each and every one of us is to die, the civil idea that human beings have the right to die when they want to is another question that needs to be discussed.  Should we as a society grant people the right to die whenever they want?  Should our society be given the freedom to kill other people whenever they want to die?   I will leave that up for debate. 
Yes, there is the religious objection that states God will determine when someone is to die, but what about those who don’t believe in God?  There are secular objections to euthanasia.  The decision to die will affect other people such as the family and friends of the patient who asks to be put to death.  It will cause severe consequences such as guilt, hurt, and pain.  However, there is a balance issue: Should the pain that others experience overrule the rights and the pain of the patient, or should the patient’s pain be put first and foremost?
The Belgium Parliament recently passed a law that allows children to be euthanized.  It has become the first country in the world that would allow the euthanisation of children of all age groups with a passing of 86 to 44, with 12 abstaining.  The executive director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, Alex Schadenberg, said that, “Belgium has [previously] abandoned the elderly, and now they are saying they will abandon their children.”  Here are some of the comments from the article used in this paper (Baklinksi).  One commenter said, “I live in Belgium and I apologize in the name of the civilised (sic) people in my country for this absolutely horrifying law, which only shows how so-called progressive thinking is really just a gradual abandoning of all human dignity.”  Another commenter said, “What happened to your people?  How did they fall so far into the abyss?” and, “I remember a time when doctors took an oat to preserve human life.”
Not all countries are like Belgium. In Hartford, Connecticut, a bill that would allow physicians to help terminally ill patients end their own lives did get voted on in a recent Public Health Committee meeting.  There was simply not enough time to go over the material before the legislative session ends on May 7th.  It was said that “Those kind of things need ironed out.”  Although supporters of the bill will reintroduce it next year when there will be time to go over the bill.  Discussion has “exploded across the state,” according to Tim Appleton, the director of the Compassion and Choices advocacy group, a supporter of the bill.  (“Assisted Suicide Bill Won’t Get Vote This Session”).
Various medical associations around the world have differing views on euthanasia as well.  The American Medical Association (the AMA) has taken a stand for life when it comes to euthanasia.  It states that physicians need to instead of focusing on euthanizing a patient, doing as much as he or she can to help the patient’s needs (“Opinion 2.21-Euthanasia”).  The British Medical Association has reaffirmed its opposition to PAD in 2009 (“BMA Reaffirms Opposition To Assisted Suicide, UK”). 
Even physicians themselves have gotten in on the debate.  Dr. Kerry Pound recently wrote,
We know that the top reasons for terminally ill patients to request suicide are that they feel life is no longer enjoyable, have lost autonomy, or believe their lives to be burdensome or without dignity (and NOT as a result of pain). And although these reported symptoms may be similar to those expressed by depressed patients without an underlying terminal illness, no counseling nor psychiatric assessment is mandated under the bill. Psychotherapy and psychopharmacology may provide great relief for any patient suffering from depression. As physicians, we routinely hospitalize depressed patients who are contemplating suicide — for the purpose of treating the depression and getting the patient to a healthier mental state to deal with life. Shouldn’t we require that a thorough psychiatric assessment be done for those struggling to come to terms with their own mortality? (Pound).
Nearly all pain can be relieved.  Notice I said “nearly.”  Some pain can’t be relieved, no matter what www.care.org.uk says.  Emotional pain, although mentally “debilitatingly” painful as it can be, is not enough to put someone to death over.  That would be assisted suicide.  There is also no “right” way to die, and there are dangers to each way to die (Arguments For and Against Euthanasia").  A failed injection could render someone completely incapable of moving.  A wrong dose of medicine could cause a heart attack in someone.  A gunshot to the wrong part of the head could render someone without speech capabilities. 
What about the people who die without permission?  In 1990 in Holland, nearly one thousand patients were killed without their permission.  In the Netherlands, euthanasia and physician assisted suicides are completely legal, although not all physicians report their actions (Arguments For and Against Euthanasia").  We also can’t truly control death.  Even though we may administer a lethal dose of medication, the time it takes to kill someone varies.  I’m reminded of an episode of House.  The character Dr. Ezra Powell was a physician who studied cancer cells in lab rats.  One night while doing research, Dr. Powell collapsed on his lab floor, and the rats he was experimenting on started to eat at his face.  When Dr. Powell was found, he was unable to be diagnosed, and thus taken to the care of Dr. House.  Dr. House then puts Dr. Powell through his regular medical rigor and antics.  However, House is unable to find the cause of Dr. Powell’s collapse.  Meanwhile, Dr. Powell continues to deteriorate.  Then, for some reason, House’s team starts to discuss euthanasia.  Drs. Cameron and Foreman are whole-heartedly against the idea of euthanasia, while Drs. House, Chase, and Wilson are in support of it. 
Dr. Powell tells House to cure him in twenty-four hours, or Dr. Powell is going to refuse any further treatment, thus creating a form of physician assisted suicide, where the physician involuntarily and passively euthanizes Dr. Powell.  (Involuntary passive physician assisted suicide is when the doctor decides to do nothing, and let nature takes its course in killing the patient [Cauthen]).  House then fails to diagnose Dr. Powell within the twenty-four hour mark, and Dr. Powell refuses any more treatment.  As House readies a fatal dose of morphine, Dr. Foreman tries to stop House from injecting Dr. Powell.  House comically says, “…someone here is going to get a buttload of morphine.  I’m not exactly sure who at this point,” referring to Dr. Foreman’s refuse to let House inject Dr. Powell.  When Dr. House injects Dr. Powell, we learn that the “fatal” dose wasn’t enough to kill him, but simply put him in a coma so House can diagnose Dr. Powell without interruption.  We learn that House may not be in support of euthanasia, but we also learn that House may simply have put Dr. Powell in a coma to finish the puzzle, which keeps House happy.  The ethics of putting a patient in a coma without permission is for another time.
When Dr. Powell wakes up, and finds that his abdomen and legs have lost sensation, he gets upset that he wasn’t killed.  He then learns that he has terminal amyloidosis.  As Dr. Powell struggles for breath, Dr. Cameron gets irate at him for his unethical work on children in the 1960s.  “Ethics hinders research,” says Dr. Powell.  Then Dr. Cameron slices a piece of skin off of Dr. Powell’s arm, and Dr. Powell congratulates her for doing the right thing.  Dr. Powell dies later that night (“Informed Consent [House]”).  The questions here are, Should’ve House just let Dr. Powell die without putting him in a coma, or should’ve House put a fatal dose of morphine in him?
The Roman Catholic Church discussed euthanasia via Pope Pius XII when he condemned the Nazi’s use of euthanasia.  He was the first pope to address the subject (Fr. Saunders).  In 1980, the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith released a statement called the Declaration of Euthanasia.  This statement says        A) making an attempt at anyone’s life is evil. B) each person is bound to life according to God’s plan.  C) To kill oneself is a rejection of God’s plan.  We could go further to say that this means that asking someone else to take one’s life is also a rejection of God’s plan.  The document also states that each person is bound to traditional healthcare (whatever that means in the Catholic Church), and to food, water, and ordinary medicine.  Ordinary medicines, according to the Declaration of Euthanasia, offers hope of benefit of the medication being taken, and are not a burden on the patient and the family.  This means that if the medication taken doesn’t provide the right benefit, and it is seriously detrimental to the family and patient, it isn’t to be considered ordinary medicine (I’m reminded of another episode of House when Dr. House gives a woman suffering from severe headaches by prescribing her Viagra, because it dilates the blood vessels, letting more blood flow through the vessels). 
The document also states that euthanasia is an “easy death,” meaning an “easy way out.”  The wrongness is attributed to the intention of the will to end one’s life quickly.  The document states that God cannot permit in any way the taking of someone’s life, or the life of his or her own, whether it being the killing of an innocent human being, being that of an embryo, fetus, infant, adult, or old person suffering from an terminal disease, or a person who is dying.  Otherwise, the person would have to deal with years of intolerable suffering.
The Catholic Church’s Catechism states in number 2276, “…Thus an act or omission which, of itself or by intention, causes death in order to eliminate suffering constitutes a murder gravely contrary to the dignity of the human person and to the respect due to the living God, his Creator...” It also says in 2278, “Discontinuing medical procedures that are burdensome, dangerous, extraordinary, or disproportionate to the expected outcome can be legitimate; it is the refusal of ‘over-zealous’ treatment....” They even say that even if death is imminent, the “ordinary care owed to a sick person cannot be legitimately interrupted,” (“Catechism of the Catholic Church”). 
The Lutheran church (on both sides of the political spectrum), offer different values when it comes to euthanasia.  The Missouri Synod says that euthanasia is “mercy killing.”  Only God knows whether a disease is truly terminal (taking power away from the doctors who God uses to diagnose and treat disease).  This church also believes that when it comes to a patient’s terminal disease, let nature takes its course (“Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod – Euthanasia Statement”).  The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America believes similarly.  It believes that life is a gift from God, and that both birth and death are part of the life process.  But it says that both living and dying should take place in a loving and caring community.  It also mandates respect for each person.  The ELCA believes that euthanasia is wrong, but says, “While this affirmation is clear, we also recognize that responsible heath care professionals struggle to choose the lesser evil in ambiguous borderline situations—for example, when pain becomes so unmanageable that life is indistinguishable from torture…we approve the legalization of physician assisted death,” (“A Message On End-Of-Life Decisions”).
Other denominations and Christian traditions believe several things about euthanasia.  The Mennonite church believes that “taking the life of a human being is wrong at any stage of life for any reason,”  (“Association of Christian Churches of South Dakota”). The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints believes in the sanctity of human life, and is opposed to euthanasia.  They do not believe in allowing a person to die from natural causes by “removing a patient from artificial means of life support, as in the case of a long-term illness,” which, “falls within the definition of euthanasia (“Euthanasia and Prolonged Life”).  Finally, the Orthodox church believes that, in the words of the 1976 Christmas encyclical of former Archbishop Iakovos, euthanasia, along with abortion and homosexuality, are a “moral alienation.”  The church, currently, sees, “The Church distinguishes between euthanasia and the withholding of extraordinary means to prolong life. It affirms the sanctity of human life and man's God-given responsibility to preserve life. But it rejects an attitude which disregards the inevitability of physical death,” (“The Stand of the Orthodox Church on Controversial Issues—Greek Orthodox Archdiocese in America”).
Kenneth Couthen, in his book titled The Ethics of Assisted Death, gives a wonderful list of reasons as to why euthanasia should or should not be legal.  What are our arguments against euthanasia?  A. Euthanasia breaks the Hippocratic Oath, or the oath that doctors take that forbids them giving drugs to patients that will kill the patient.  However, that also means that they are bound to Apollo (not God) and the ancient gods and goddesses.   B. Euthanasia breaks the trust between patient and doctor.  We expect doctors to heal; not to kill.  C.  Personal autonomy is not an absolute principle.  There are no unlimited choices in life.  D. Suicide and killing are wrong.  As we have seen here, there is a difference between legal and illegal killing.  But both are considered wrong.  E.  The patient may simply be temporarily depressed, with regrets.  The patient may only be thinking in the now-moment, and not thinking rationally.  The patient is thinking emotionally.
What are the arguments for euthanasia?  A. Individual autonomy takes precedence over the interests of the state in protecting life in some circumstances.  Does the patient have a terminal illness or constant suffering?  Does the patient have an illness that could seriously affect the general population?  These circumstances can range from simple “I want to die,” to “I’ve currently on fire and I can’t stand the pain.  It’s torture.”  If euthanasia was to be legalized, and this “circumstances” clause put in legislation, to who would determine whether a circumstance is justified?  B. The doctor may grant patient’s request to end life early because of constant suffering.  What can doctors do to help alleviate pain?  These arguments for and against euthanasia will continue to be thorns of the debate on whether euthanasia should be legalized or not. 





Works Cited
Aghababaei, Naser, Hojjatollah Farahani, and Javad Hatami. "Euthanasia Attitude; A Comparison of Two Scales." Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine 4.1 (2011): 1-6. Web. 10 Apr. 2014.
"AMA Policy on End-of-Life Care." AMA Policy on End-of-Life Care. American Medical Association, n.d. Web. 12 Apr. 2014.
"Arguments For and Against Euthanasia." CARE Arguments For and Against Euthanasia Comments. CARE, n.d. Web. 12 Apr. 2014.
"Assisted Suicide Bill Won't Get Vote This Session." Boston.com. The New York Times, 25 Mar. 2014. Web. 13 Apr. 2014.
"Association of Christian Churchesof South Dakota." Mennonite Church USA. World Bible Publishers, Inc., n.d. Web. 12 Apr. 2014.
Baklinski, Peter. "LifeSiteNews Mobile | Belgium Parliament Passes Law Allowing Children to Be Euthanized."LifeSiteNews. LifeSiteNews.com, 13 Feb. 2014. Web. 11 Apr. 2014.
"BMA Reaffirms Opposition To Assisted Suicide, UK." Medical News Today. MediLexicon International, 2 July 2009. Web. 13 Apr. 2014.
"Catechism of the Catholic Church." Catechism of the Catholic Church. Euthanasia.com, n.d. Web. 12 Apr. 2014.
Cauthen, Kenneth. The Ethics of Assisted Death: When Life Becomes a Burden Too Hard to Bear. Lima, OH: CSS Pub., 1999. Print.
"Declaration on Euthanasia - May 5, 1980." Declaration on Euthanasia - May 5, 1980. Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith, May 1980. Web. 08 Apr. 2014.
Dowbiggin, Ian. "From Sander to Schiavo: Morality, Partisan Politics, and America’s Culture War over Euthanasia, 1950–2010." Journal of Policy History 25.01 (2013): 12-41. Print.
"Euthanasia and Prolonging Life." Www.mormonnewsroom.org. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, n.d. Web. 12 Apr. 2014.
"Informed Consent (House)." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 04 May 2014. Web. 10 Apr. 2014.
Jackson, Adam. "‘Thou Shalt Not Kill; But Needst Not Strive Officiously to Keep Alive’: Further Clarification of the Law regarding Mercy Killing, Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide." The Journal of Criminal Law 77.6 (2013): 468-75. Print.
"Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod - Euthanasia Statement." Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod - Euthanasia Statement. Euthanasia.com, n.d. Web. 10 Apr. 2014.
"A Message On End-Of-Life Decisions." Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, 9 Nov. 1992. Web. 10 Apr. 2014.
"Opinion 2.21 - Euthanasia." Opinion 2.21 - Euthanasia. American Medical Association, June 1996. Web. 13 Apr. 2014.
Pound, Kerry, MD. "Column: A Physician's Perspective on Question 2 » Opinion » SalemNews.com, Salem, MA." Opinion ATOM. Salem News, 30 Oct. 2012. Web. 13 Apr. 2014.
"Pro-euthanasia Arguments." BBC News. BBC, n.d. Web. 09 Apr. 2014.
Rachels, James. The Morality of Euthanasia. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007. Print.
Saunders, Fr. William. "Library : What Is the Church's Teaching on Euthanasia? - Catholic Culture." Library : What Is the Church's Teaching on Euthanasia? - Catholic Culture. Trinity Communications, n.d. Web. 09 Apr. 2014.
Sharp, Robert. "The Dangers Of Euthanasia And Dementia: How Kantian Thinking Might Be Used To Support Non-Voluntary Euthanasia In Cases Of Extreme Dementia." Bioethics 26.5 (2012): 231-35. Print.
Slick, Matt. "What Does the Bible Say about Euthanasia?" CARM. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 Apr. 2014.
"The Stand of the Orthodox Church on Controversial Issues.” The Stand of the Orthodox Church on Controversial Issues — Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America. Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, n.d. Web. 12 Apr. 2014.
Van Ittersum, Frans J., and Lambert Hendriks. "Organ Donation after Euthanasia." National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 12.3 (2012): 431-37. Web.

Thursday, March 13, 2014

So much hate from atheists

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/13/religion-poll-nbc-wsj_n_4957886.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000051

I was reading the comments and some are just downright shocking and very offensive.

Manuela Mcmoura No...Religions were/are responible for blood and tears...for centuries already...

Phoenix Martinez No. Religion has no part in my life, and I'm happier for it. I don't waste my time, money, or effort on fairy tale bullshit anymore. I spend my time learning and reading about science, life, and the cosmos.

Doffing Dardu Christianity, Muslim, Jewish, etc, will be mythology within 400 years (hopefully, as long as we continue to evolve for the better). People put faith in something with such little evidence, yet deny plain facts put right in their face. Ignorance at its finest.

Christian Cochran I do my best to stay as far away from it as I can.

Ben Johnson David, looks like the religion genocide missed one. Stop trying to start shit. We get it you worship your dog. No one judges you or tells you how its wrong to do what ever your doing. Go home, you're an idiot.

Brandon Toner Spirituality is just as unimportant as religion.

Adam Ouannas Yes. Muslim & Proud 

               Jessica Murray No one cares.

Tara Marshall I gave up on god and religion about the same time I gave up on Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny. There's more evidence for either of these childhood myths, quite frankly.

Raheem Johnson That means we're finally becoming smarter!

David Runyan If christ and satan (actually existed) and fell on my street I would fight tooth and nail to protect satan from christ. All we know about satan is that (other than him not existing until the dawn christianity) is that he went to war on the throne, but it doesn't say why he went to war. How do we know that lucifer didn't finally stand up after the flood, after sodom and gomorrah, and all the other acts of genocide committed by god and finally say "ENOUGH" that he would not stand by and listen to the dieing screams of humans? How do we know that it isn't your god who is the tyrannical dictator that we need protection from?

Bob Trieger Hell no. The sooner it's gone for good the better off the world will be.

Nathaniel Patrick Fancypants It's "important" in my life as in, religion and its figureheads are actively a threat to my quality of life in the 21st century and my understanding of what constitutes a free and civil society.

Felix Moshe Bieberology is much more critical to my insentience

Flash Kellish yup, just as much as jock itch.